FORM 10-Q
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
| |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008
|
|
or
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file
number: 0-51547
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
Delaware
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
20-2783228
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
10011
(Zip
code)
|
(212) 624-3700
(Registrants telephone
number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
As of November 5, 2008, the Registrant had
9,602,380 shares of Class A Common Stock (including
unvested shares of restricted WebMD Class A Common Stock)
and 48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock
outstanding.
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the
period ended September 30, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
WebMD®
, WebMD
Health®
,
Medscape®
, CME
Circle®
,
eMedicine®
,
MedicineNet®
,
theheart.org®
,
RxList®
, The Little Blue
Booktm,
Subimo®
,
Summex®
and
Medsite®
are among the trademarks of WebMD Health Corp. or its
subsidiaries.
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All
statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may
be, forward-looking statements. For example, statements
concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or
forecasts and statements that describe our objectives, future
performance, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements reflect
managements current expectations concerning future results
and events and can generally be identified by the use of
expressions such as may, will,
should, could, would,
likely, predict, potential,
continue, future, estimate,
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, foresee, and
other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the
future tense.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be different from any
future results, performance and achievements expressed or
implied by these statements. The following important risks and
uncertainties could affect our future results, causing those
results to differ materially from those expressed in our
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
| |
|
failure to achieve sufficient levels of usage of our public
portals;
|
| |
| |
|
failure to achieve sufficient levels of utilization and market
acceptance of new and updated products and services;
|
| |
| |
|
difficulties in forming and maintaining relationships with
customers and strategic partners;
|
| |
| |
|
the inability to successfully deploy new or updated applications
or services;
|
| |
| |
|
the anticipated benefits from acquisitions not being fully
realized or not being realized within the expected time frames;
|
| |
| |
|
the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
| |
| |
|
general economic, business or regulatory conditions affecting
the healthcare, information technology, and Internet industries
being less favorable than expected; and
|
| |
| |
|
the other risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
under the heading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Factors That May Affect Our Future
Financial Condition or Results of Operations.
|
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other
unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material
adverse effects on our future results.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Except as
required by law or regulation, we do not undertake any
obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
subsequent events or circumstances.
3
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
199,752
|
|
|
$
|
213,753
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
132,848
|
|
|
|
80,900
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,261 at September 30, 2008 and $1,165 at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
78,148
|
|
|
|
86,081
|
|
|
Current portion of prepaid advertising
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
Due from HLTH
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
10,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
426,075
|
|
|
|
395,056
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
49,935
|
|
|
|
48,589
|
|
|
Prepaid advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,521
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
221,281
|
|
|
|
221,429
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
36,314
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
12,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
727,392
|
|
|
$
|
718,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
26,442
|
|
|
$
|
26,498
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
81,740
|
|
|
|
76,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
108,182
|
|
|
|
102,899
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
8,719
|
|
|
|
9,210
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share,
500,000,000 shares authorized; 9,393,011 shares issued
and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
9,113,708 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share,
150,000,000 shares authorized; 48,100,000 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
546,483
|
|
|
|
531,043
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
68,923
|
|
|
|
75,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
610,491
|
|
|
|
606,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
727,392
|
|
|
$
|
718,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
100,387
|
|
|
$
|
86,098
|
|
|
$
|
271,245
|
|
|
$
|
235,312
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
35,322
|
|
|
|
30,021
|
|
|
|
99,655
|
|
|
|
87,636
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
26,441
|
|
|
|
22,459
|
|
|
|
77,731
|
|
|
|
67,258
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
15,209
|
|
|
|
15,388
|
|
|
|
43,598
|
|
|
|
46,874
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
21,106
|
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
8,419
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
|
|
|
18,898
|
|
|
|
14,631
|
|
|
|
10,168
|
|
|
|
22,049
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
8,132
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
16,385
|
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
17,378
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,492
|
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
57,770
|
|
|
|
57,154
|
|
|
|
57,699
|
|
|
|
57,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
59,111
|
|
|
|
59,848
|
|
|
|
57,699
|
|
|
|
59,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,106
|
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
10,775
|
|
|
|
15,592
|
|
|
Deferred and other income taxes
|
|
|
15,170
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
27,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,933
|
|
|
|
14,648
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(2,652
|
)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
|
(7,463
|
)
|
|
Due to/from HLTH
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
80,752
|
|
|
|
72,809
|
|
|
Net cash used by discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
80,752
|
|
|
|
72,774
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
43,300
|
|
|
|
123,885
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(127,900
|
)
|
|
|
(214,295
|
)
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(15,054
|
)
|
|
|
(13,574
|
)
|
|
Cash received from sale of business and business combinations,
net of fees
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(98,521
|
)
|
|
|
(103,984
|
)
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
Tax benefit on stock-based awards
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
Net cash transfers with HLTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
164,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,001
|
)
|
|
|
133,054
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
213,753
|
|
|
|
44,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
199,752
|
|
|
$
|
177,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
(In thousands, except share and per share data,
unaudited)
|
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Background
and Basis of Presentation
WebMD Health Corp. (the Company) is a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated on May 3, 2005. The
Company completed an initial public offering (IPO)
of Class A Common Stock on September 28, 2005. The
Companys Class A Common Stock has traded on the
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol WBMD since
September 29, 2005 and now trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. Prior to the date of the IPO, the Company was a
wholly-owned subsidiary of HLTH Corporation (HLTH)
and its consolidated financial statements had been derived from
the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of
HLTH, principally representing the WebMD segment, using the
historical results of operations, and historical basis of assets
and liabilities of the WebMD related businesses. Since the
completion of the IPO, the Company has been a majority-owned
subsidiary of HLTH, which currently owns 83.1% of the equity of
the Company, after accounting for the impact of shares to be
issued pursuant to the purchase agreement for the acquisition of
Subimo, LLC. The Companys Class A Common Stock has
one vote per share, while the Companys Class B Common
Stock has five votes per share. As a result, the Companys
Class B Common Stock owned by HLTH represented, as of
September 30, 2008, 96.2% of the combined voting power of
the Companys outstanding Common Stock.
Transactions between the Company and HLTH have been identified
in these notes to the consolidated financial statements as
Transactions with HLTH (see Note 4).
Interim
Financial Statements
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company
have been prepared by management and reflect all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) that, in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected
for any subsequent period or for the entire year ending
December 31, 2008. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted
under the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
regulations.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
included herein should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Seasonality
The timing of the Companys revenue is affected by seasonal
factors. Advertising and sponsorship revenue within the Online
Services segment are seasonal, primarily as a result of the
annual budget approval process of the advertising and
sponsorship clients of the public portals. This portion of the
Companys revenue is usually the lowest in the first
quarter of each calendar year, and increases during each
consecutive quarter throughout the year. The Companys
private portal licensing revenue is historically highest in the
second half of the year as new customers are typically added
during this period in conjunction with their annual open
enrollment periods for employee benefits. Finally, the annual
distribution cycle within the Publishing and Other Services
segment results in a significant portion of the Companys
revenue in this segment being recognized in the second and third
quarters of each calendar year.
7
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company bases
its estimates on historical experience, current business
factors, and various other assumptions that the Company believes
are necessary to consider to form a basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company is
subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events,
economic and political factors and changes in the Companys
business environment; therefore, actual results could differ
from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used
in the preparation of the Companys financial statements
will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired,
as additional information is obtained and as the Companys
operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made
when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
reported results of operations; if material, the effects of
changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management affect: revenue recognition, the
allowance for doubtful accounts, the carrying value of prepaid
advertising, the carrying value of long-lived assets (including
goodwill and intangible assets), the carrying value of
investments in auction rate securities, the amortization period
of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill), the carrying value,
capitalization and amortization of software and Web site
development costs, the provision for income taxes and related
deferred tax accounts, certain accrued expenses and
contingencies, share-based compensation to employees and
transactions with HLTH.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share are
presented in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic
income (loss) per common share has been computed using the
weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
during the periods presented. Diluted income (loss) per common
share has been computed using the weighted-average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during the periods, increased
to give effect to potentially dilutive securities.
8
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,502
|
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: (shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares Basic
|
|
|
57,770
|
|
|
|
57,154
|
|
|
|
57,699
|
|
|
|
57,067
|
|
|
Employee stock options, restricted stock and Deferred Shares
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed
conversions Diluted
|
|
|
59,111
|
|
|
|
59,848
|
|
|
|
57,699
|
|
|
|
59,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in basic and diluted shares for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 is the impact of shares to
be issued pursuant to the purchase agreement for the acquisition
of Subimo, LLC. The Company deferred the issuance of
640,930 shares of Class A Common Stock (Deferred
Shares) until December 2008, subject to acceleration in
certain circumstances. A maximum of 246,508 of the Deferred
Shares may be used to settle any outstanding claims or
warranties the Company may have against the seller. For purposes
of calculating basic net income per share, the impact of
394,422 shares representing the non-contingent portion of
the Deferred Shares was included. The additional Deferred Shares
of 246,508 were considered if their effect was dilutive.
The Company has excluded certain outstanding stock options,
restricted stock and Deferred Shares from the calculation of
diluted income (loss) per common share during the periods in
which such securities were anti-dilutive. The total number of
shares excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss)
per share was 2,446,553 and 5,602,351 for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and
1,186,855 and 1,252,553 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On October 10, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) Financial Accounting Standard
(FAS) Opinion
No. 157-3
(FSP
FAS 157-3).
The FSP clarifies the application of FASB Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market
that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
FAS 157-3
is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. The Company believes
that its financial assets are in compliance with FSP
FAS 157-3.
9
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value
of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),
Business Combinations, and other U.S. GAAP.
This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that
this FSP will have on the Companys results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R), a replacement of
SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and applies
to all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides that, upon
initially obtaining control, an acquirer shall recognize
100 percent of the fair values of acquired assets,
including goodwill, and assumed liabilities, with only limited
exceptions, even if the acquirer has not acquired
100 percent of its target. As a consequence, the current
step acquisition model will be eliminated. Additionally,
SFAS 141R changes current practice, in part, as follows:
(1) contingent consideration arrangements will be fair
valued at the acquisition date and included on that basis in the
purchase price consideration; (2) transaction costs will be
expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized as part of the
purchase price; (3) pre-acquisition contingencies, such as
legal issues, will generally have to be accounted for in
purchase accounting at fair value; and (4) in order to
accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting, the
requirements in SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, would
have to be met at the acquisition date. While there is no
expected impact to the Companys consolidated financial
statements on the accounting for acquisitions completed prior to
December 31, 2008, the adoption of SFAS 141R on
January 1, 2009 could materially change the accounting for
business combinations consummated subsequent to that date and
for tax matters relating to prior acquisitions settled
subsequent to December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
2.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company entered into an Asset
Sale Agreement and completed the sale of certain assets and
certain liabilities of its medical reference publications
business, including the publications ACP Medicine and
ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice. The assets and
liabilities sold are referred to below as ACS/ACP
Business. ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery are
official publications of the American College of Physicians and
the American College of Surgeons, respectively. As a result of
the sale, the historical financial information of the ACS/ACP
Business has been reclassified as discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for the prior
year period. The Company will receive net cash proceeds of
$2,809, consisting of $1,734 received in the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 and the remaining $1,075 to be received in
the quarter ending December 31, 2008. The Company incurred
approximately $800 of professional fees and other expenses
associated with the sale of the ACS/ACP Business. During 2007,
the Company recognized a gain of $3,571, net of a tax benefit of
$177. Summarized operating results for the discontinued
operations of the ACS/ACP Business for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
3.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123, (Revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R), which replaces
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) and supersedes
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
25). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized as compensation expense over the service period
(generally the vesting period) in the consolidated financial
statements based on their fair values. The Company elected to
use the modified prospective transition method and as a result
prior period results were not restated. Under the modified
prospective transition method, awards that were granted or
modified on or after January 1, 2006 are measured and
accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R. Unvested stock
options and restricted stock awards that were granted prior to
January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 123, using the same grant date fair
value and same expense attribution method used under
SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the
results of operations over the remaining vesting periods. The
impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also
estimated and considered in the amount recognized for all
stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2006.
The Company has various stock-based compensation plans under
which directors, officers and other eligible employees receive
awards of options to purchase Company Class A Common Stock
and HLTH Common Stock and restricted shares of Company
Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock. The following
sections of this note summarize the activity for each of these
plans.
HLTH
Plans
Certain WebMD employees participate in the stock-based
compensation plans of HLTH (collectively, the HLTH
Plans). Under the HLTH Plans certain of the Companys
employees have received grants of options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock and restricted HLTH Common Stock. Additionally, all
eligible WebMD employees were provided the opportunity to
participate in HLTHs employee stock purchase plan through
April 30, 2008. All unvested options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock and restricted HLTH Common Stock held by the
Companys employees as of the effective date of the IPO
continue to vest under the original terms of those awards. An
aggregate of 5,936,018 shares of HLTH Common Stock remained
available for grant under the HLTH Plans at September 30,
2008.
11
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the HLTH Plans vest and become
exercisable ratably over a three to five year period based on
their individual grant dates subject to continued employment on
the applicable vesting dates. The majority of options granted
under the HLTH Plans expire within ten years from the date of
grant. Options are granted at prices not less than the fair
market value of HLTHs Common Stock on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes activity for the HLTH Plans
relating to the Companys employees during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
8,825,988
|
|
|
$
|
13.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(781,141
|
)
|
|
|
7.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(321,669
|
)
|
|
|
22.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
7,723,178
|
|
|
$
|
13.84
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
7,448,079
|
|
|
$
|
14.04
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of HLTHs Common Stock on
September 30, 2008, which was $11.43, less the applicable
exercise price of the underlying option. This aggregate
intrinsic value represents the amount that would have been
realized if all the option holders had exercised their options
on September 30, 2008.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected
volatility is based on implied volatility from traded options of
HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility of HLTH
Common Stock. Prior to January 1, 2006, only historical
volatility was considered. The expected term represents the
period of time that options are expected to be outstanding
following their grant date, and was determined using historical
exercise data. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected
term of the options on the grant date.
Restricted
Stock Awards
HLTH Restricted Stock consists of shares of HLTH Common Stock
which have been awarded to the Companys employees with
restrictions that cause them to be subject to substantial risk
of forfeiture and restrict their sale or other transfer by the
employee until they vest. Generally, HLTH Restricted Stock
awards vest ratably over a three to five year period based on
their individual award dates subject to continued employment on
the applicable vesting dates. There was no activity of
non-vested HLTH Restricted Stock relating to the Companys
employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Proceeds received by HLTH from the exercise of options to
purchase HLTH Common Stock were $3,383 and $5,816 during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, and $2,044 and $46,363 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The
intrinsic value related to the exercise of these stock options,
as well as the fair value of shares of HLTH Restricted Stock
that vested was $2,523 and $3,424 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1,213
and $16,415 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
12
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
WebMD
Plans
During September 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan). In connection with
the acquisition of Subimo, LLC in December 2006, the Company
adopted the WebMD Health Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan for
Employees of Subimo, LLC (the Subimo Plan). The
terms of the Subimo Plan are similar to the terms of the 2005
Plan but it has not been approved by the Companys
stockholders. Awards under the Subimo Plan were made on the date
of the Companys acquisition of Subimo, LLC in reliance on
the NASDAQ Stock Market exception to shareholder approval for
equity grants to new hires. No additional grants will be made
under the Subimo Plan. The 2005 Plan and the Subimo Plan are
included in all references as the WebMD Plans. The
maximum number of shares of the Companys Class A
Common Stock that may be subject to options or restricted stock
awards under the WebMD Plans is 9,480,574, subject to adjustment
in accordance with the terms of the WebMD Plans. The Company had
an aggregate of 2,440,150 shares of Class A Common
Stock available for grant under the WebMD Plans at
September 30, 2008.
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the WebMD Plans vest and become
exercisable ratably over a four-year period based on their
individual grant dates, subject to continued employment on the
applicable vesting dates. The options granted under the WebMD
Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant. Options
are granted at prices not less than the fair market value of the
Company Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The
following table summarizes activity for the WebMD Plans during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
5,020,551
|
|
|
$
|
27.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
609,800
|
|
|
|
32.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(196,652
|
)
|
|
|
17.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(373,551
|
)
|
|
|
31.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
5,060,148
|
|
|
$
|
28.23
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
32,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
2,239,061
|
|
|
$
|
22.22
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of the Companys Class A
Common Stock on September 30, 2008, which was $29.74, less
the applicable exercise price of the underlying option. This
aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount that would have
been realized if all the option holders had exercised their
options on September 30, 2008.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
considering the assumptions noted in the following table. Prior
to August 1, 2007, expected volatility was based on implied
volatility from traded options of stock of comparable companies
combined with historical stock price volatility of comparable
companies. Beginning on August 1, 2007, expected volatility
is based on implied volatility from traded options of Company
Class A Common Stock combined with historical volatility of
Company Class A Common Stock. The expected term represents
the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding
following their grant date, and was determined using historical
13
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
exercise data. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected
term of the options on the grant date.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
10.75
|
|
|
$
|
18.16
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
Company Restricted Stock consists of shares of Company
Class A Common Stock which have been awarded to employees
with restrictions that cause them to be subject to substantial
risk of forfeiture and restrict their sale or other transfer by
the employee until they vest. Generally, the Companys
Restricted Stock awards vest ratably over a four year period
from their individual award dates subject to continued
employment on the applicable vesting dates. The following table
summarizes the activity of non-vested Company Restricted Stock
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
307,722
|
|
|
$
|
29.46
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
28.32
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(90,687
|
)
|
|
|
21.59
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(12,500
|
)
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
223,535
|
|
|
$
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase
Company Class A Common Stock were $1,061 and $3,453 during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, and $2,767 and $8,490 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The
intrinsic value related to the exercise of these stock options,
as well as the fair value of shares of Company Restricted Stock
that vested was $3,299 and $5,769 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $8,203
and $15,291 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
HLTHs Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
allowed eligible employees of the Company the opportunity to
purchase shares of HLTH Common Stock through payroll deductions,
up to 15% of a participants annual compensation with a
maximum of 5,000 shares available per participant during
each purchase period. The purchase price of the stock was 85% of
the fair market value on the last day of each purchase period.
There were 31,787 and 22,335 shares of HLTH Common Stock
issued to the Companys employees under HLTHs ESPP
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The ESPP was terminated after the purchase period
ended April 30, 2008.
Other
At the time of the IPO and each year on the anniversary of the
IPO, the Company issued shares of its Class A Common Stock
to each non-employee director with a value equal to the
directors annual board and
14
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
committee retainers. The Company recorded $85 of stock-based
compensation expense during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and $255 during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 in connection with these
issuances.
Additionally, the Company recorded $279 of stock-based
compensation expense during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and $837 and $815 during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, in connection with a stock transferability right
for shares required to be issued in connection with the
acquisition of Subimo, LLC by the Company.
Summary
of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the components and classification
of stock-based compensation expense:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
HLTH Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
2,169
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
WebMD Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
3,805
|
|
|
|
8,163
|
|
|
|
10,424
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
ESPP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
5,687
|
|
|
$
|
10,775
|
|
|
$
|
15,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
1,005
|
|
|
$
|
1,597
|
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
$
|
4,159
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,889
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
5,687
|
|
|
$
|
10,775
|
|
|
$
|
15,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, approximately $163 and $30,561 of
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
0.39 years and 1.50 years, related to the HLTH Plans
and the WebMD Plans, respectively.
|
|
|
4.
|
Transactions
with HLTH
|
Agreements
with HLTH
In connection with the IPO in September 2005, the Company
entered into a number of agreements with HLTH governing the
future relationship of the companies, including a Services
Agreement, a Tax Sharing Agreement and an Indemnity Agreement.
These agreements cover a variety of matters, including
responsibility for certain liabilities, including tax
liabilities, as well as matters related to HLTH providing the
Company with administrative services, such as payroll,
accounting, tax, employee benefit plan, employee insurance,
intellectual property, legal and information processing services.
On February 15, 2006, the Tax Sharing Agreement was amended
to provide that HLTH would compensate the Company for any use of
the Companys net operating loss (NOL)
carryforwards resulting from certain extraordinary transactions,
as defined in the Tax Sharing Agreement. On September 14,
2006,
15
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
HLTH completed the sale of its Emdeon Practice Services business
(EPS) for approximately $565,000 in cash (EPS
Sale). On November 16, 2006, HLTH completed the sale
of a 52% interest in its Emdeon Business Services business
(EBS) for approximately $1,200,000 in cash
(2006 EBS Sale). HLTH recognized a taxable gain on
the sale of EPS and EBS and utilized a portion of its federal
NOL carryforwards to offset the gain on these transactions.
Under the Tax Sharing Agreement between HLTH and the Company,
the Company was reimbursed for its NOL carryforwards utilized by
HLTH in these transactions at the current federal statutory rate
of 35%. During February 2007, HLTH reimbursed the Company
$140,000 as an estimate of the payment required pursuant to the
Tax Sharing Agreement with respect to the EPS Sale and the 2006
EBS Sale, which amount was subject to adjustment in connection
with the filing of the applicable tax returns. During September
2007, HLTH finalized the NOL carryforward attributable to the
Company that was utilized as a result of the EPS Sale and the
2006 EBS Sale and reimbursed the Company an additional $9,862.
These reimbursements were recorded as capital contributions,
which increased additional
paid-in-capital
at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007,
respectively.
In connection with the termination of the merger between HLTH
and the Company on October 19, 2008 HLTH and the Company
have agreed to amend the Tax Sharing Agreement so that for tax
years beginning after December 31, 2007, HLTH will no
longer be required to reimburse the Company for use of NOL
carryforwards attributable to the Company that may result from
certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH. See Note 11
below for a description of the termination of the proposed HLTH
Merger. The Tax Sharing Agreement has not, other than with
respect to certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH, required
either HLTH or the Company to reimburse the other party for any
net tax savings realized by the consolidated group as a result
of the groups utilization of the Companys or
HLTHs NOL carryforwards during the period of
consolidation, and that will continue following the amendment.
Accordingly, HLTH will not be required to reimburse the Company
for use of NOL carryforwards attributable to the Company in
connection with (a) HLTHs sale in February 2008 of
its 48% minority interest in EBS to an affiliate of General
Atlantic LLC and investment funds managed by Hellman &
Friedman LLC for a sale price of $575,000 in cash or
(b) HLTHs sale in July 2008 of its ViPS segment to an
affiliate of General Dynamics Corporation for approximately
$225,000 in cash. HLTH expects to recognize taxable gains on
these transactions and expects to utilize a portion of the
Companys federal NOL carryforward to offset a portion of
the tax liability resulting from these transactions. Based upon
information available at the time of this filing, the
Companys current estimate is that the NOL carryforwards
that were available as of December 31, 2007 will be reduced
by an aggregate of approximately $120,000 as a result of
HLTHs utilization of the Companys NOL carryforwards
to offset HLTHs taxable gains on these transactions. This
estimated amount is based on various assumptions and is subject
to material change. The actual amount of the Companys NOL
carryforwards that HLTH will utilize cannot be determined until
HLTH completes its 2008 income tax calculations.
Charges
from the Company to HLTH:
Revenue: The Company sells certain of its
products and services to HLTH businesses. These amounts are
included in revenue during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007. The Company charges HLTH rates
comparable to those charged to third parties for similar
products and services.
Charges
from HLTH to the Company:
Corporate Services: The Company is charged a
services fee (the Services Fee) for costs related to
corporate services provided by HLTH. The services that HLTH
provides include certain administrative services, including
payroll, accounting, tax planning and compliance, employee
benefit plans, legal matters and information processing. In
addition, the Company reimburses HLTH for an allocated portion
of certain expenses that HLTH incurs for outside services and
similar items, including insurance fees, outside personnel,
facilities costs, professional fees, software maintenance fees
and telecommunications costs. HLTH has agreed to make the
services available to the Company for up to 5 years
following the IPO. These expense allocations
16
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
were determined on a basis that HLTH and the Company consider to
be a reasonable assessment of the costs of providing these
services, exclusive of any profit margin. The basis the Company
and HLTH used to determine these expense allocations required
management to make certain judgments and assumptions. These cost
allocations are reflected in the table below under the caption
Corporate services shared services
allocation. The Services Fee is reflected in general and
administrative expense within the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
Healthcare Expense: The Company is charged for
its employees participation in HLTHs healthcare
plans. Healthcare expense is charged based on the number of
total employees of the Company and reflects HLTHs average
cost of these benefits per employee. Healthcare expense is
reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations in the same expense captions as the related salary
costs of those employees.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: Stock-based
compensation expense is related to stock option issuances and
restricted stock awards of HLTH Common Stock that have been
granted to certain employees of the Company. Stock-based
compensation expense is allocated on a specific employee
identification basis. The expense is reflected in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the same
expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees.
The allocation of stock-based compensation expense related to
HLTH Common Stock is recorded as a capital contribution in
additional paid-in capital.
The following table summarizes the allocations reflected in the
Companys consolidated financial statements:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Charges from the Company to HLTH:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany revenue
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
Charges from HLTH to the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate services shared services allocation
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
Healthcare expense
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Significant
Transactions
|
America
Online, Inc.
In May 2001, HLTH entered into an agreement for a strategic
alliance with Time Warner, Inc. Under the agreement, the Company
was the primary provider of healthcare content, tools and
services for use on certain America Online (AOL)
properties. The agreement ended on May 1, 2007. Under the
agreement, the Company and AOL shared certain revenue from
advertising, commerce and programming on the health channels of
the AOL properties and on a co-branded service created for AOL
by the Company. The Company was entitled to share in revenue and
was guaranteed a minimum of $12,000 during each contract year
from May 1, 2005 through May 1, 2007, when the
agreement ended, for its share of advertising revenue. Included
in revenue was $2,658 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, related to sales to third parties of
advertising and sponsorship on the AOL health channels,
primarily sold through the Companys sales organization.
Also included in revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was revenue of $1,515, related to the
guarantee described above.
17
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fidelity
Human Resources Services Company LLC
In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Fidelity
Human Resources Services Company LLC (FHRS) to
integrate the Companys private portals product into the
services FHRS provides to its clients. FHRS provides human
resources administration and benefits administration services to
employers. The Company recorded revenue of $2,272 and $7,062
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, and $2,441 and $7,693 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Included in
accounts receivable as of September 30, 2008 was $1,159
related to the FHRS agreement.
The Company provides health information services to consumers,
physicians, healthcare professionals, employers and health plans
through the Companys public and private online portals and
health-focused publications. The Companys two operating
segments are:
|
|
|
| |
|
Online Services. The Company provides both
public and private online portals. The Companys public
portals for consumers enable them to obtain health and wellness
information (including information on specific diseases and
conditions), check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual
healthcare information, receive periodic
e-newsletters
on topics of individual interest, enroll in interactive courses
and participate in online communities with peers and experts.
The Companys public portals for physicians and healthcare
professionals make it easier for them to access clinical
reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical
information, learn about new treatment options, earn continuing
medical education credit and communicate with peers. The
Companys private portals enable employers and health plans
to provide their employees and plan members with access to
personalized health and benefit information and decision-support
technology that helps them make more informed benefit, provider
and treatment choices. The Company provides related services for
use by such employees and members, including lifestyle education
and personalized telephonic health coaching. The Company also
provides
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
|
| |
| |
|
Publishing and Other Services. The Company
publishes The Little Blue Book, a physician directory,
and WebMD the Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed
to physician office waiting rooms. Until December 31, 2007,
the Company also published medical reference textbooks. See
Note 2 for further details.
|
The performance of the Companys business is monitored
based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization and other non-cash items. Other non-cash items
include non-cash advertising expense and non-cash stock-based
compensation expense. Corporate and other overhead functions are
allocated to segments on a specifically identifiable basis or
other reasonable method of allocation. The Company considers
these allocations to be a reasonable reflection of the
utilization of costs incurred. The Company does not disaggregate
assets for internal management reporting and, therefore, such
information is not presented. There are no inter-segment revenue
transactions.
18
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized financial information for each of the Companys
operating segments and a reconciliation to income (loss) from
continuing operations are presented below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and sponsorship
|
|
$
|
72,046
|
|
|
$
|
59,087
|
|
|
$
|
190,494
|
|
|
$
|
158,944
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
22,139
|
|
|
|
20,001
|
|
|
|
65,928
|
|
|
|
59,915
|
|
|
Content syndication and other
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Online Services
|
|
|
94,577
|
|
|
|
79,578
|
|
|
|
257,576
|
|
|
|
220,886
|
|
|
Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
5,810
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
14,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,387
|
|
|
$
|
86,098
|
|
|
$
|
271,245
|
|
|
$
|
235,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization
and other non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online Services
|
|
$
|
25,956
|
|
|
$
|
21,948
|
|
|
$
|
61,287
|
|
|
$
|
48,982
|
|
|
Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,168
|
|
|
|
24,086
|
|
|
|
62,772
|
|
|
|
51,625
|
|
|
Interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other
non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
8,419
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,133
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(21,106
|
)
|
|
|
(20,017
|
)
|
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,736
|
)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,575
|
)
|
|
|
(5,687
|
)
|
|
|
(10,775
|
)
|
|
|
(15,592
|
)
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(8,132
|
)
|
|
|
(3,129
|
)
|
|
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
|
(4,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
17,378
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,492
|
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Facility
|
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), for assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a
common definition for fair value to be applied to existing GAAP
that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about
such fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did
not have an impact on the Companys financial position or
operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Additionally, SFAS 157
19
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use
of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
|
|
|
| |
Level 1:
|
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
|
| |
| |
Level 2:
|
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are
corroborated by market data.
|
| |
| |
Level 3:
|
Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data,
which require the use of the reporting entitys own
assumptions.
|
The Company did not have any Level 1 or Level 2 assets
as of September 30, 2008. The Companys Level 3
financial assets that were measured at fair value as of
September 30, 2008 were auction rate securities
(ARS) of $132,848.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances
of the Companys Level 3 assets, which consist of the
Companys ARS holdings:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
169,200
|
|
|
Redemptions
|
|
|
(3,700
|
)
|
|
Impairment charge included in earnings
|
|
|
(27,406
|
)
|
|
Interest accretion included in earnings
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
Unrealized losses included in other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
132,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company holds investments in ARS which have been classified
as Level 3 assets as described above. The types of ARS
holdings the Company owns are backed by student loans, 97% of
which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. Historically, the fair value of the Companys
ARS holdings approximated par value due to the frequent auction
periods, generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided
liquidity to these investments. However, since February 2008,
virtually all auctions involving these securities have failed.
The result of a failed auction is that these ARS holdings will
continue to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each
respective auction date; however, liquidity of the securities
will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer
redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time
as other markets for these ARS holdings develop. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company concluded
that the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximated
the face value due to the lack of liquidity. The securities have
been classified within Level 3 as their valuation requires
substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not
currently observable in the market due to the lack of trading in
the securities.
The Company estimated the fair value of its ARS holdings using
an income approach valuation technique. Using this approach,
expected future cash flows were calculated over the expected
life of each security and were discounted to a single present
value using a market required rate of return. Some of the more
significant assumptions made in the present value calculations
were (i) the estimated weighted average lives for the loan
portfolios underlying each individual ARS, which range from 4 to
14 years and (ii) the required rates of return used to
discount the estimated future cash flows over the estimated life
of each security, which considered both the credit quality for
each individual ARS and the market liquidity for these
investments. As of March 31, 2008, the Company concluded
the fair value of its ARS holdings was $141,044 compared to a
face value of $168,450. The impairment in value, or $27,406, was
considered to be other-than-temporary and, accordingly, was
recorded as an impairment charge within the statement of
operations during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
20
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In making the determination that the impairment was
other-than-temporary, the Company considered (i) the
current market liquidity for ARS, particularly student loan
backed ARS, (ii) the long-term maturities of the loan
portfolios underlying each ARS owned by the Company which, on a
weighted average basis, extend to as many as 14 years and
(iii) the ability and intent of the Company to hold its ARS
investments until sufficient liquidity returns to the auction
rate market to enable the sale of these securities or until the
investments mature.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
the Company received $2,000 and $3,700, respectively, associated
with the partial redemption of certain of its ARS holdings,
which represented 100% of their face value. As a result, as of
September 30, 2008, the total face value of the
Companys ARS holdings was $165,500. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company reduced
the carrying value of its ARS holdings by $4,107 and $5,490,
respectively. The Company assessed these declines in fair market
value to be temporary as they resulted from fluctuations in
interest rate assumptions and, therefore, recorded these
declines as unrealized loss in other comprehensive loss in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company continues to monitor the market for ARS as well as
the individual ARS investments it owns. The Company may be
required to record additional losses in future periods if the
fair value of its ARS holdings deteriorates further.
Credit
Facility
On May 6, 2008, the Company entered into a non-recourse
credit facility (the Credit Facility) with Citigroup
that is secured by the Companys ARS holdings (including,
in some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings),
that will allow the Company to borrow up to 75% of the face
amount of the ARS holdings pledged as collateral under the
Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is governed by a loan
agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, containing customary
representations and warranties of the borrower and certain
affirmative covenants and negative covenants relating to the
pledged collateral. Under the loan agreement, the borrower and
the lender may, in certain circumstances, cause the pledged
collateral to be sold, with the proceeds of any such sale
required to be applied in full immediately to repayment of
amounts borrowed.
No borrowings have been made under the Credit Facility to date.
The Company can make borrowings under its Credit Facility until
May 2009. The interest rate applicable to such borrowings will
be one-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points. Any borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Facility after March 2009 become
demand loans, subject to 60 days notice, with recourse only
to the pledged collateral.
|
|
|
8.
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss)
and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss includes
certain changes in equity that are excluded from net income
(loss), such as changes in unrealized losses on
available-for-sale marketable securities. The following table
presents the components of comprehensive income (loss):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities
|
|
$
|
(4,107
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
11,492
|
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6,659
|
|
|
$
|
11,492
|
|
|
$
|
(11,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
9.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
213,983
|
|
|
$
|
11,045
|
|
|
$
|
225,028
|
|
|
Purchase price allocations and other adjustments
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
210,384
|
|
|
|
11,045
|
|
|
|
221,429
|
|
|
Purchase price allocations and other adjustments
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
210,236
|
|
|
$
|
11,045
|
|
|
$
|
221,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the
following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life(a)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Content
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(14,051
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(12,581
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,373
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
33,191
|
|
|
|
(12,798
|
)
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
33,191
|
|
|
|
(10,183
|
)
|
|
|
23,008
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
|
|
(12,844
|
)
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
|
|
(10,126
|
)
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
|
|
(3,319
|
)
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
|
|
(2,725
|
)
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,929
|
|
|
$
|
(43,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
71,929
|
|
|
$
|
(35,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,314
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The calculation of the weighted
average remaining useful life is based on the net book value and
the remaining amortization period of each respective intangible
asset.
|
Amortization expense was $2,406 and $7,397 during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and
$3,320 and $9,853 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. Aggregate amortization
expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 (October 1st to December 31st)
|
|
$
|
2,318
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,401
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In the normal course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are involved in various claims and legal
proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters,
including those discussed in Note 12 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the Companys 2007 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
has yet to be determined, the Company does not believe that
their outcomes will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
22
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
11.
|
Termination
of Proposed Merger with HLTH
|
On February 20, 2008, HLTH and the Company entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement),
pursuant to which HLTH would merge into the Company (the
HLTH Merger), with the Company continuing as the
surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement was amended on
May 6, 2008 and September 12, 2008. Pursuant to the
terms of a Termination Agreement entered into on
October 19, 2008 (the Termination Agreement),
HLTH and the Company mutually agreed, in light of recent turmoil
in financial markets, to terminate the Merger Agreement. The
termination was by mutual agreement of the companies and was
unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of each of the
companies and by a special committee of independent directors of
the Company. The Termination Agreement maintains HLTHs
obligation, under the terms of the Merger Agreement, to pay the
expenses of the Company incurred in connection with the merger.
Under the Termination Agreement, HLTH and the Company also
agreed to amend its Tax Sharing Agreement with HLTH. See Note 4
above for a description of the amendment to the Tax Sharing
Agreement. The Termination Agreement also provided for HLTH to
assign to the Company the Amended and Restated Data License
Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2008, among HLTH, EBS
Master LLC and certain affiliated companies.
|
|
|
12.
|
Pending
Marketing Technology Solutions Inc. Acquisition
|
On September 15, 2008, the Company announced that it had
entered into a definitive agreement to acquire QualityHealth.com
and its owner, Marketing Technology Solutions Inc.
(MTS). MTS provides on-line performance-based
marketing and media programs directed at pharmaceutical and
other healthcare related advertisers. The purchase price for MTS
is $50 million in cash, payable at closing, and the Company
has agreed to pay up to an additional $25 million in cash
if certain performance thresholds are achieved relating to
calendar year 2009.
23
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Item 2 contains forward-looking statements with
respect to possible events, outcomes or results that are, and
are expected to continue to be, subject to risks, uncertainties
and contingencies, including those identified in this Item. See
Forward-Looking Statements on page 3.
Overview
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, or MD&A, is provided as a
supplement to the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and is
intended to provide an understanding of our results of
operations, financial condition and changes in financial
condition. Our MD&A is organized as follows:
|
|
|
| |
|
Introduction. This section provides a general
description of our company and operating segments, a description
of certain recent developments, background information on
certain trends and a discussion of how seasonal factors may
impact the timing of our revenue.
|
| |
| |
|
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates. This section discusses those
accounting policies that are considered important to the
evaluation and reporting of our financial condition and results
of operations, and whose application requires us to exercise
subjective and often complex judgments in making estimates and
assumptions.
|
| |
| |
|
Transactions with HLTH. This section describes
the services that we receive from HLTH Corporation (which we
refer to as HLTH) and the costs of these services, as well as
the fees we charge HLTH for our services and our tax sharing
agreement with HLTH.
|
| |
| |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. This section
provides a summary of the most recent authoritative accounting
standards and guidance that have either been recently adopted by
our company or may be adopted in the future.
|
| |
| |
|
Results of Operations and Results of Operations by Operating
Segment. These sections provide our analysis and
outlook for the significant line items on our statements of
operations, as well as other information that we deem meaningful
to understand our results of operations on both a consolidated
basis and an operating segment basis.
|
| |
| |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section
provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flows, as well as
a discussion of our commitments that existed as of
September 30, 2008.
|
| |
| |
|
Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or
Results of Operations. This section describes
circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on our
financial condition or results of operations, or that could
change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of our
businesses. The factors discussed in this section are in
addition to factors that may be described elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report.
|
In this MD&A, dollar amounts are in thousands, unless
otherwise noted.
Introduction
Our
Company
We are a leading provider of health information services to
consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals,
employers and health plans. We have organized our business into
two operating segments as follows:
|
|
|
| |
|
Online Services. We own and operate both
public and private online portals. Our public portals enable
consumers to become more informed about healthcare choices and
assist them in playing an active role in managing their health.
The public portals also enable physicians and other healthcare
professionals to improve their clinical knowledge and practice
of medicine, as well as their communication with patients. Our
public portals generate revenue primarily through the sale of
advertising and sponsorship
|
24
|
|
|
| |
|
products, including continuing medical education (which we refer
to as CME) services. Our sponsors and advertisers include
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consumer
products companies. Through our private portals for employers
and health plans, we provide information and services that
enable employees and members, respectively, to make more
informed benefit, treatment and provider decisions. We also
provide related services for use by such employees and members,
including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health
coaching. We generate revenue from our private portals through
the licensing of these portals to employers and health plans
either directly or through distributors, as well as fees charged
for our coaching services. We also distribute our online content
and services to other entities and generate revenue from these
arrangements through the sale of advertising and sponsorship
products and content syndication fees. We also provide
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Publishing and Other Services. We provide
several offline products and services: The Little Blue Book,
a physician directory; and WebMD the Magazine, a
consumer-targeted publication that we distribute free of charge
to physician office waiting rooms. We generate revenue from
sales of The Little Blue Book directories and
advertisements in those directories, and sales of advertisements
in WebMD the Magazine. Until December 31, 2007, we
published ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery: Principles of
Practice, our medical reference textbooks. We sold this
business in 2007 and it has now been reflected as a discontinued
operation in our financial statements. Our Publishing and Other
Services segment complements our Online Services segment and
extends the reach of our brand and our influence among
health-involved consumers and clinically-active physicians.
|
Termination
of Proposed HLTH Merger
On October 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a termination
agreement (which we refer to as the Termination Agreement), HLTH
and WebMD mutually agreed, in light of recent turmoil in
financial markets, to terminate the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of February 20, 2008, between HLTH and
WebMD, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of
May 6, 2008, and Amendment No. 2, dated as of
September 12, 2008 (which we refer to as the Merger
Agreement). The Merger Agreement resulted from negotiations
between HLTH and a Special Committee of the Board of Directors
of WebMD during late 2007 and early 2008. The termination of the
Merger Agreement was by mutual agreement of the companies and
was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of each of
the companies and by a special committee of independent
directors of WebMD. The Boards determined that both HLTH, as
controlling stockholder of WebMD, and the public stockholders of
WebMD would benefit from WebMD continuing as a publicly-traded
subsidiary with no long-term debt and approximately
$340 million in cash and investments. The Boards concluded
that, by terminating the merger, HLTH and WebMD would retain
financial flexibility and be in a position to pursue potential
acquisition opportunities expected to be available to companies
with significant cash resources in a period of financial market
uncertainty.
The Termination Agreement maintains HLTHs obligation,
under the terms of the Merger Agreement, to pay the expenses of
WebMD incurred in connection with the merger. Under the
Termination Agreement, HLTH and WebMD have also agreed to amend
the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of
February 15, 2006, between them (which we refer to as the
Tax Sharing Agreement) so that, for tax years beginning after
December 31, 2007, HLTH will no longer be required to
reimburse WebMD for use of net operating loss (which we refer to
as NOL) carryforwards attributable to WebMD that may result from
certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH. The Tax Sharing
Agreement has not, other than with respect to certain
extraordinary transactions by HLTH, required either HLTH or
WebMD to reimburse the other party for any net tax savings
realized by the consolidated group as a result of the
groups utilization of WebMDs or HLTHs NOL
carryforwards during the period of consolidation, and that will
continue following the amendment. The Termination Agreement also
provided for HLTH to assign to WebMD the Amended and Restated
Data License Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2008, among
HLTH, EBS Master LLC and certain affiliated companies.
25
Recent or
Pending Transactions
Pending Acquisition of Marketing Technology Solutions
Inc. On September 15, 2008, we announced
that we have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire
QualityHealth.com and its owner, Marketing Technology Solutions
Inc. (which we refer to as MTS). MTS provides on-line
performance-based marketing and media programs directed at
pharmaceutical and other healthcare related advertisers. The
purchase price for MTS is $50,000 in cash, payable at closing,
and we have agreed to pay up to an additional $25,000 in cash if
certain performance thresholds are achieved relating to calendar
year 2009.
Sale of ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery. As of
December 31, 2007, we entered into an Asset Sale Agreement
and completed the sale of certain assets and certain liabilities
of our medical reference publications business, including the
publications ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery: Principles
and Practice. The assets and liabilities sold are referred
to below as the ACS/ACP Business. ACP Medicine
and ACS Surgery are official publications of the
American College of Physicians and the American College of
Surgeons, respectively. We will receive net cash proceeds of
$2,809, consisting of $1,734 received in the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 and the remaining $1,075 to be received in
the quarter ending December 31, 2008. We incurred
approximately $800 of professional fees and other expenses
associated with the sale of the ACS/ACP Business. In connection
with the sale, we recognized a gain of $3,571, net of a tax
benefit of $177, as of December 31, 2007. The decision to
divest the ACS/ACP Business was made because management
determined that it was not a good fit with our core business.
Other
Significant Developments and Trends
Impairment of Auction Rate Securities; Non-Recourse Credit
Facility. We hold investments in auction rate
securities (which we refer to as ARS) backed by student loans,
97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education
Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa
when purchased. Historically, the fair value of our ARS
investments approximated par value due to the frequent auction
periods, generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided
liquidity to these investments. However, since February 2008,
virtually all auctions involving these securities have failed.
The result of a failed auction is that these ARS will continue
to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each
respective auction date; however, liquidity of the securities
will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer
redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time
as other markets for these ARS investments develop. We concluded
that the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximated
the par value due to the lack of liquidity.
As of March 31, 2008, we concluded the fair value of our
ARS was $141,044, compared to a face value of $168,450. The
impairment in value, or $27,406 was considered to be
other-than-temporary, and accordingly, was recorded as an
impairment charge within the statement of operations during the
three months ended March 31, 2008. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, we received $2,000
and $3,700, respectively, associated with the partial redemption
of certain of our ARS holdings which represented 100% of their
face value. As a result, as of September 30, 2008, the
total face value of our ARS holdings was $165,500, compared to a
fair value of $132,848. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we reduced the carrying value of our
ARS holdings by $4,107 and $5,490, respectively. We assessed
these declines in fair market value to be temporary as they
resulted from fluctuations in interest rate assumptions and,
therefore, recorded these declines as an unrealized loss in our
stockholders equity.
In May 2008, we entered into a non-recourse credit facility
(which we refer to as the Credit Facility) with Citigroup that
is secured by its ARS holdings (including, in some
circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings), that will
allow WebMD to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of the ARS
holdings pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. The
Credit Facility is governed by a loan agreement, dated as of
May 6, 2008, containing customary representations and
warranties of the borrower and certain affirmative covenants and
negative covenants relating to the pledged collateral. Under the
loan agreement, the borrower and the lender may, in certain
circumstances, cause the pledged collateral to be sold, with the
proceeds of any such sale required to be applied in full
immediately to repayment of amounts borrowed.
No borrowings have been made under the Credit Facility to date.
Borrowings can be made under this Credit Facility until May
2009. The interest rate applicable to such borrowings will be
one-month LIBOR plus
26
250 basis points. Any borrowings outstanding under the
Credit Facility after March 2009 become demand loans, subject to
60 days notice, with recourse only to the pledged
collateral.
HLTH has also entered into a credit facility with Citigroup, on
substantially similar terms and conditions.
We continue to monitor the market for ARS as well as the
individual ARS investments we own. We may be required to record
additional losses in future periods if the fair value of our ARS
holdings deteriorates further.
Use of the Internet by Consumers and
Physicians. The Internet has emerged as a major
communications medium and has already fundamentally changed many
sectors of the economy, including the marketing and sales of
financial services, travel, and entertainment, among others. The
Internet is also changing the healthcare industry and has
transformed how consumers and physicians find and utilize
healthcare information. As consumers are required to assume
greater financial responsibility for rising healthcare costs,
the Internet serves as a valuable resource by providing them
with immediate access to searchable and dynamic interactive
content to check symptoms, assess risks, understand diseases,
find providers and evaluate treatment options. The Internet has
also become a primary source of information for physicians
seeking to improve clinical practice and is growing relative to
traditional information sources, such as conferences, meetings
and offline journals.
Increased Online Marketing and Education Spending for
Healthcare Products. Pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies spend large amounts
each year marketing their products and educating consumers and
physicians about them; however, only a small portion of this
amount is currently spent on online services. We believe that
these companies, which comprise the majority of our advertisers
and sponsors, are becoming increasingly aware of the
effectiveness of the Internet relative to traditional media in
providing health, clinical and product-related information to
consumers and physicians, and this increasing awareness will
result in increasing demand for our services. However,
notwithstanding our general expectation for increased demand,
our advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary significantly
from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of
which are not in our control, and some of which may be difficult
to forecast accurately, including the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
The majority of our advertising and sponsorship contracts are
for terms of approximately four to twelve months. We have
relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship
contracts. In addition, we have noted a trend this year, among
some of our advertisers and sponsors, of seeking to enter into
shorter term contracts than they had entered into in the past.
|
| |
| |
|
The time between the date of initial contact with a potential
advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the
execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that
program may be subject to delays over which we have little or no
control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the
advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals.
|
Other factors that may affect the timing of contracting for
specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of
revenue under such contracts, include: the timing of FDA
approval for new products or for new approved uses for existing
products; the timing of FDA approval of generic products that
compete with existing brand name products; the timing of
withdrawals of products from the market; seasonal factors
relating to the prevalence of specific health conditions and
other seasonal factors that may affect the timing of promotional
campaigns for specific products; and the scheduling of
conferences for physicians and other healthcare professionals.
Changes in Health Plan Design; Health Management
Initiatives. In a healthcare market where a
greater share of the responsibility for healthcare costs and
decision-making has been increasingly shifting to consumers, use
of information technology (including personal health records) to
assist consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare
has also increased. We believe that through our WebMD Health and
Benefits Manager tools, including our personal health record
application, we are well positioned to play a role in this
consumer-directed healthcare environment, and these services
will be a significant driver for the growth of our private
portals during the next several years. However, our growth
strategy depends, in part, on increasing usage of our private
portal services by our employer and health plan clients
employees and members, respectively. Increasing usage of our
services requires us to continue to deliver and improve the
27
underlying technology and develop new and updated applications,
features and services. In addition, we face competition in the
area of healthcare decision-support tools and online health
management applications and health information services. Many of
our competitors have greater financial, technical, product
development, marketing and other resources than we do, and may
be better known than we are. We also expect that, for clients
and potential clients in the industries most seriously affected
by recent adverse changes in general economic conditions
(including those in the financial services industry), we may
experience some reductions in initial contracts, contract
expansions and contract renewals for our private portal services.
The healthcare industry in the United States and relationships
among healthcare payers, providers and consumers are very
complicated. In addition, the Internet and the market for online
services are relatively new and still evolving. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the trends identified above will
continue or that the expected benefits to our businesses from
our responses to those trends will be achieved. In addition, the
market for healthcare information services is highly competitive
and not only are our existing competitors seeking to benefit
from these same trends, but the trends may also attract
additional competitors.
Seasonality
The timing of our revenue is affected by seasonal factors.
Advertising and sponsorship revenue within our Online Services
segment is seasonal, primarily due to the annual budget approval
process of the advertising and sponsorship clients of our public
portals. This portion of our revenue is usually the lowest in
the first quarter of each calendar year, and increases during
each consecutive quarter throughout the year. Our private portal
licensing revenue is historically higher in the second half of
the year as new customers are typically added during this period
in conjunction with their annual open enrollment periods for
employee benefits. Finally, the annual distribution cycle within
our Publishing and Other Services segment results in a
significant portion of our revenue in this segment being
recognized in the second and third quarters of each calendar
year. The timing of revenue in relation to our expenses, much of
which do not vary directly with revenue, has an impact on cost
of operations, sales and marketing and general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue in each
calendar quarter.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our MD&A is based upon our unaudited consolidated financial
statements and notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements, which were prepared in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on
historical experience, current business factors, and various
other assumptions that we believe are necessary to consider to
form a basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact
of future events, economic and political factors, and changes in
our business environment; therefore, actual results could differ
from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used
in preparation of our financial statements will change as new
events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional
information is obtained and as our operating environment
changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances
warrant. Such changes in estimates and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations;
if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed
in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those
related to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of prepaid advertising, the
carrying value of long-lived assets (including goodwill and
intangible assets), the carrying value of investments in auction
rate securities, the amortization period of long-lived assets
(excluding goodwill), the carrying value, capitalization and
amortization of software and Web site development costs, the
provision for income taxes and related deferred tax accounts,
certain accrued expenses and contingencies, share-based
compensation to employees and transactions with HLTH.
28
We believe the following reflects our critical accounting
policies and our more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our unaudited consolidated financial
statements:
|
|
|
| |
|
Revenue Recognition. Revenue from advertising
is recognized as advertisements are delivered or as publications
are distributed. Revenue from sponsorship arrangements, content
syndication and distribution arrangements, and licenses of
healthcare management tools and private portals as well as
related health coaching services are recognized ratably over the
term of the applicable agreement. Revenue from the sponsorship
of CME is recognized over the period we substantially complete
our contractual deliverables as determined by the applicable
agreements. When contractual arrangements contain multiple
elements, revenue is allocated to each element based on its
relative fair value determined using prices charged when
elements are sold separately. In certain instances where fair
value does not exist for all the elements, the amount of revenue
allocated to the delivered elements equals the total
consideration less the fair value of the undelivered elements.
In instances where fair value does not exist for the undelivered
elements, revenue is recognized when the last element is
delivered.
|
| |
| |
|
Long-Lived Assets. Our long-lived assets
consist of property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible
assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets arise from the
acquisitions we have made. The amount assigned to intangible
assets is subjective and based on our estimates of the future
benefit of the intangible assets using accepted valuation
techniques, such as discounted cash flow and replacement cost
models. Our long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, are amortized
over their estimated useful lives, which we determine based on
the consideration of several factors including the period of
time the asset is expected to remain in service. We evaluate the
carrying value and remaining useful lives of long-lived assets,
excluding goodwill, whenever indicators of impairment are
present. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually,
and whenever indicators of impairment are present. We use a
discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of
goodwill. There was no impairment of goodwill noted as a result
of our impairment testing in 2007.
|
| |
| |
|
Fair Value of Investments. We hold investments
in ARS which are backed by student loans, 97% of which are
guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program
(FFELP), and all of which had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. Historically, the fair value of our ARS investments
approximated par value due to the frequent auction periods,
generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided liquidity to
these investments. However, since February 2008, virtually all
auctions involving these securities have failed. The result of a
failed auction is that these ARS will continue to pay interest
in accordance with their terms at each respective auction date;
however, liquidity of the securities will be limited until there
is a successful auction, the issuer redeems the securities, the
securities mature or until such time as other markets for these
ARS investments develop. We cannot be certain regarding the
amount of time it will take for an auction market or other
markets to develop. Accordingly, during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, we concluded that the estimated fair value
of the ARS no longer approximated the par value due to the lack
of liquidity.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
We estimated the fair value of our ARS investments using an
income approach valuation technique. Using this approach,
expected future cash flows were calculated over the expected
life of each security and were discounted to a single present
value using a market required rate of return. Some of the more
significant assumptions made in the present value calculations
include (i) the estimated weighted average lives for the
loan portfolios underlying each individual ARS, which range from
4 to 14 years and (ii) the required rates of return
used to discount the estimated future cash flows over the
estimated life of each security, which considered both the
credit quality for each individual ARS and the market liquidity
for these investments. As of March 31, 2008, we concluded
the fair value of our ARS investments was $141,044, compared to
a face value of $168,450. The impairment in value, or $27,406
was considered to be other-than-temporary, and accordingly, was
recorded as an impairment charge within the statement of
operations during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
we received $2,000 and $3,700, respectively, associated with the
partial redemption of certain of our ARS holdings which
represented 100% of their face value. As a result, as of
September 30, 2008, the total face value of our ARS
holdings was $165,500. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we reduced the carrying value of our
ARS
|
29
|
|
|
| |
|
holdings by $4,107 and $5,490, respectively. We assessed these
declines in fair market value to be temporary as they resulted
from fluctuations in interest rate assumptions and, therefore,
recorded this decline as unrealized loss in other comprehensive
income.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Our ARS have been classified as Level 3 assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(which we refer to as SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, as their valuation requires substantial
judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently
observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the
securities. If different assumptions were used for the various
inputs to the valuation approach including, but not limited to,
assumptions involving the estimated lives of the ARS
investments, the estimated cash flows over those estimated
lives, and the estimated discount rates applied to those cash
flows, the estimated fair value of these investments could be
significantly higher or lower than the fair value we determined.
We continue to monitor the market for ARS as well as the
individual ARS investments we own. We may be required to record
additional losses in future periods if the fair value of our ARS
deteriorates further.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (which we refer to as
FASB) issued SFAS No. 123, (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (which we refer to as
SFAS 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (which we
refer to as SFAS 123) and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the
service period (generally the vesting period) in the
consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. We
adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 and elected to
use the modified prospective transition method and as a result,
prior period results were not restated. Under the modified
prospective method, awards that were granted or modified on or
after January 1, 2006 are measured and accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 123R. Unvested stock options and
restricted stock awards that were granted prior to
January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 123, using the same grant date fair
value and same expense attribution method used under
SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the
results of operations over the remaining vesting periods.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used in this model are expected dividend yield,
expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term.
The expected volatility for stock options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock is based on implied volatility from traded options
of HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility of HLTH
Common Stock. Prior to August 1, 2007, expected volatility
for stock options to purchase our Class A Common Stock was
based on implied volatility from traded options of stock of
comparable companies combined with historical stock price
volatility of comparable companies. Beginning on August 1,
2007, expected volatility is based on implied volatility from
traded options of our Class A Common Stock combined with
historical volatility of our Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
| |
|
Deferred Tax Assets. Our deferred tax assets
are comprised primarily of NOL carryforwards. At
December 31, 2007, we had NOL carryforwards of
approximately $668,000 on a separate return basis. At
December 31, 2007, we had NOL carryforwards of $272,000 on
a legal entity basis. This difference reflects the utilization
of approximately $430,000 by the HLTH consolidated group as a
result of the sale of certain HLTH businesses. Subject to
certain limitations, these loss carryforwards may be used to
offset taxable income in future periods, reducing the amount of
taxes we might otherwise be required to pay. Based on
information available as of the date of this filing, we
currently estimate that the NOL carryforwards that were
available as of December 31, 2007 will be reduced by
approximately $120,000 as a result of HLTHs utilization of
these NOLs in connection with the sales of certain HLTH
businesses in 2008. This estimated amount is based on various
assumptions and is subject to material change. The actual amount
of our NOL carryforwards that will be utilized by HLTH cannot be
determined until HLTH completes its 2008 income tax calculations.
|
Substantially all of our NOL carryforwards are reserved for by a
valuation allowance. In determining the need for a valuation
allowance, management determined the probability of realizing
deferred tax
30
assets, taking into consideration factors including historical
operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable
income. Management will continue to evaluate the need for a
valuation allowance and, in the future should management
determine that realization of the net deferred tax asset is more
likely than not, some or all of the valuation allowance will be
reversed, and our effective tax rate may be reduced by such
reversal.
|
|
|
| |
|
Transactions with HLTH. As discussed further
below, our expenses reflect a services fee for an allocation of
costs for corporate services provided by HLTH. Our expenses also
reflect the allocation of a portion of the cost of HLTHs
healthcare plans and the allocation of stock-based compensation
expense related to restricted stock awards and other stock-based
compensation. We are included in the consolidated federal tax
return filed by HLTH. Additionally, our revenue includes revenue
from HLTH for services we provide.
|
Transactions
with HLTH
Agreements
with HLTH
In connection with our IPO in September 2005, we entered into a
number of agreements with HLTH governing the future relationship
of the companies, including a Services Agreement, a Tax Sharing
Agreement and an Indemnity Agreement. These agreements cover a
variety of matters, including responsibility for certain
liabilities, including tax liabilities, as well as matters
related to HLTH providing us with administrative services, such
as payroll, accounting, tax, employee benefit plan, employee
insurance, intellectual property, legal and information
processing services.
On February 15, 2006, the Tax Sharing Agreement was amended
to provide that HLTH would compensate us for any use of our NOL
carryforwards resulting from certain extraordinary transactions,
as defined in the Tax Sharing Agreement. On September 14,
2006, HLTH completed the sale of its Emdeon Practice Services
business (EPS) for approximately $565,000 in cash
(EPS Sale). On November 16, 2006, HLTH
completed the sale of a 52% interest in its Emdeon Business
Services business (EBS) for approximately $1,200,000
in cash (2006 EBS Sale). HLTH recognized a taxable
gain on the sale of EPS and EBS and utilized a portion of its
federal NOL carryforwards to offset the gain on these
transactions. Under the Tax Sharing Agreement between HLTH and
us, we were reimbursed for our NOL carryforwards utilized by
HLTH in these transactions at the current federal statutory rate
of 35%. During February 2007, HLTH reimbursed us $140,000 as an
estimate of the payment required pursuant to the Tax Sharing
Agreement with respect to the EPS Sale and the 2006 EBS Sale,
which was subject to adjustment in connection with the filing of
the applicable tax returns. During September 2007, HLTH
finalized the NOL carryforward attributable to us that was
utilized as a result of the EPS Sale and the 2006 EBS Sale and
reimbursed us an additional $9,862. These reimbursements were
recorded as capital contributions which increased additional
paid-in-capital
at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007,
respectively.
In connection with the termination of the merger between HLTH
and us on October 19, 2008 we and HLTH have agreed to amend
the Tax Sharing Agreement so that for tax years beginning after
December 31, 2007, HLTH will no longer be required to
reimburse us for use of NOL carryforwards attributable to us
that may result from certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH.
See Introduction Termination of
Proposed HLTH Merger for a description of the termination
of the proposed HLTH Merger. The Tax Sharing Agreement has not,
other than with respect to certain extraordinary transactions by
HLTH, required either HLTH or us to reimburse the other party
for any net tax savings realized by the consolidated group as a
result of the groups utilization of our or HLTHs NOL
carryforwards during the period of consolidation, and that will
continue following the amendment. Accordingly, HLTH will not be
required to reimburse us for use of NOL carryforwards
attributable to us in connection with (a) HLTHs sale
in February 2008 of its 48% minority interest in EBS to an
affiliate of General Atlantic LLC and investment funds managed
by Hellman & Friedman LLC for a sale price of $575,000
in cash or (b) HLTHs sale in July 2008 of its ViPS
segment to an affiliate of General Dynamics Corporation for
approximately $225,000 in cash. HLTH expects to recognize
taxable gains on these transactions and expects to utilize a
portion of our federal NOL carryforwards to offset a portion of
the tax liability resulting from these transactions. Based upon
information available as of the time
31
of this filing, we currently estimate that our NOL carryforwards
will be reduced by an aggregate of approximately $120,000 as a
result of HLTHs utilization of our NOL carryforwards to
offset its taxable gains on these transactions. This estimated
amount is based on various assumptions and is subject to
material change. The actual amount of our NOL carryforwards that
HLTH will utilize cannot be determined until HLTH completes its
2008 income tax calculations.
Charges
from the Company to HLTH:
Revenue: We sell certain of our products and
services to HLTH businesses. These amounts are included in
revenue during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008. We charge HLTH rates comparable to
those charged to third parties for similar products and services.
Charges
from HLTH to the Company:
Corporate Services: We are charged a services
fee (the Services Fee) for costs related to
corporate services provided to us by HLTH. The services that
HLTH provides include certain administrative services, including
payroll, accounting, tax planning and compliance, employee
benefit plans, legal matters and information processing. In
addition, we reimburse HLTH for an allocated portion of certain
expenses that HLTH incurs for outside services and similar
items, including insurance fees, outside personnel, facilities
costs, professional fees, software maintenance fees and
telecommunications costs. HLTH has agreed to make the services
available to us for up to five years following the IPO.
These expense allocations were determined on a basis that we and
HLTH consider to be a reasonable assessment of the cost of
providing these services, exclusive of any profit margin. The
basis we and HLTH used to determine these expense allocations
required management to make certain judgments and assumptions.
These cost allocations are reflected in the table below under
the caption Corporate services shared services
allocation. The Services Fee is reflected in general and
administrative expense within our consolidated statements of
operations.
Healthcare Expense: We are charged for our
employees participation in HLTHs healthcare plans.
Healthcare expense is charged based on the number of our total
employees and reflects HLTHs average cost of these
benefits per employee. Healthcare expense is reflected in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the same
expense captions as the related salary costs of those employees.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: Stock-based
compensation expense is related to stock option issuances and
restricted stock awards of HLTH Common Stock that have been
granted to certain of our employees. Stock-based compensation
expense is allocated on a specific employee identification
basis. The expense is reflected in our consolidated statements
of operations in the same expense captions as the related salary
costs of those employees. The allocation of stock-based
compensation expense related to HLTH Common Stock is recorded as
a capital contribution in additional paid-in capital.
The following table summarizes the allocations reflected in our
consolidated financial statements:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Charges from the Company to HLTH:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany revenue
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
Charges from HLTH to the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate services shared services allocation
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
Healthcare expense
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
32
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On October 10, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (or FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) Opinion
No. 157-3
(FSP
FAS 157-3).
The FSP clarifies the application of FASB Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market
that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
FAS 157-3
is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. We believe our
financial assets are in compliance with FSP
FAS 157-3.
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value
of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),
Business Combinations, and other U.S. GAAP.
This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited.
We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this FSP
will have on our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R), a replacement of
SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and applies
to all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides that, upon
initially obtaining control, an acquirer shall recognize
100 percent of the fair values of acquired assets,
including goodwill, and assumed liabilities, with only limited
exceptions, even if the acquirer has not acquired
100 percent of its target. As a consequence, the current
step acquisition model will be eliminated. Additionally,
SFAS 141R changes current practice, in part, as follows:
(1) contingent consideration arrangements will be fair
valued at the acquisition date and included on that basis in the
purchase price consideration; (2) transaction costs will be
expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized as part of the
purchase price; (3) pre-acquisition contingencies, such as
legal issues, will generally have to be accounted for in
purchase accounting at fair value; and (4) in order to
accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting, the
requirements in FASB SFAS No. 146, Accounting
for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,
would have to be met at the acquisition date. While there is no
expected impact to our consolidated financial statements on the
accounting for acquisitions completed prior to December 31,
2008, the adoption of SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009
could materially change the accounting for business combinations
consummated subsequent to that date and for tax matters relating
to prior acquisitions settled subsequent to December 31,
2008.
33
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of
operations data and expresses that data as a percentage of
revenue for the periods presented:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
100,387
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
86,098
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
271,245
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
235,312
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
35,322
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
30,021
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
99,655
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
87,636
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
26,441
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
22,459
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
77,731
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
67,258
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
15,209
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
15,388
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
43,598
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
46,874
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,406
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
21,106
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
8,419
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
|
|
|
18,898
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
14,631
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
10,168
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
22,049
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
8,132
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
16,385
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
17,378
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
$
|
11,492
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue is derived from our two business segments: Online
Services and Publishing and Other Services. Our Online Services
segment derives revenue from advertising, sponsorship (including
online CME services),
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services, content
syndication and distribution, and licenses of private online
portals to employers, healthcare payers and others, along with
related services including lifestyle education and personalized
telephonic coaching. Our Publishing and Other Services segment
derives revenue from sales of, and advertising in, our physician
directories, and advertisements in WebMD the Magazine. We
sold our ACS/ACP Business as of December 31, 2007 and the
revenue and expenses of this business are shown in discontinued
operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Our customers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device and consumer products companies, as well as employers and
health plans. Our customers also include physicians and other
healthcare providers who buy our physician directories.
Cost of operations consists of costs related to services and
products we provide to customers and costs associated with the
operation and maintenance of our public and private portals.
These costs relate to editorial and production, Web site
operations, non-capitalized Web site development costs, and
costs related to the production and distribution of our
publications. These costs consist of expenses related to
salaries and related expenses, non-cash stock-based
compensation, creating and licensing content,
telecommunications, leased properties, printing and distribution.
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising,
product and brand promotion, salaries and related expenses, and
non-cash stock-based compensation. These expenses include items
related to salaries and related expenses of account executives,
account management and marketing personnel, costs and expenses
for marketing programs, and fees for professional marketing and
advertising services. Also included in sales and marketing
expense are the non-cash advertising expenses discussed below.
General and administrative expense consists primarily of
salaries, non-cash stock-based compensation and other
salary-related expenses of administrative, finance, legal,
information technology, human resources and
34
executive personnel. These expenses include costs of general
insurance, costs of accounting and internal control systems to
support our operations and a services fee for our portion of
certain expenses shared across all segments of HLTH.
Our discussions throughout this MD&A reference certain
non-cash expenses. The following is a summary of our principal
non-cash expenses:
|
|
|
| |
|
Non-cash advertising expense. Expense related
to the use of our prepaid advertising inventory that we received
from News Corporation in exchange for equity instruments that
HLTH issued in connection with an agreement it entered into with
News Corporation in 1999 and subsequently amended in 2000. This
non-cash advertising expense is included in cost of operations
when we utilize this advertising inventory in conjunction with
offline advertising and sponsorship programs and is included in
sales and marketing expense when we use the asset for promotion
of our brand.
|
| |
| |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
expense. Expense related to awards of our
restricted Class A Common Stock and awards of employee
stock options, as well as awards of restricted HLTH Common Stock
and awards of HLTH stock options that have been granted to
certain of our employees. Expense also related to shares issued
to our non-employee directors. Non-cash stock-based compensation
expense is reflected in the same expense captions as the related
salary costs of the respective employees.
|
The following table is a summary of our non-cash expenses
included in the respective statements of operations captions.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
1,005
|
|
|
$
|
1,597
|
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
$
|
4,159
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,889
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
5,687
|
|
|
$
|
10,775
|
|
|
$
|
15,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and
2007
The following discussion is a comparison of our results of
operations on a consolidated basis for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Revenue
Our total revenue increased 16.6% and 15.3% to $100,387 and
$271,245 in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, from $86,098 and $235,312 during the same
periods last year. These increases were primarily due to higher
advertising and sponsorship revenue from our public portals, as
described more fully below under Results of
Operations by Operating Segment Online
Services. Online Services accounted for $14,999 and
$36,690 of the revenue increases for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively, partially offset by
decreases of $710 and $757 for the three and nine months ended
September 31, 2008, respectively, within Publishing and
Other Services.
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of Operations. Cost of operations
increased to $35,322 and $99,655 in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively, from $30,021 and
$87,636 during the same periods last year. As a percentage of
revenue, cost of operations were 35.2% and 36.7% in the three
and nine months ended
35
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to 34.9% and
37.2% in the same periods last year. Included in cost of
operations in 2008 were non-cash expenses related to stock-based
compensation of $1,005 and $2,950 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to
$1,597 and $4,159 during the same periods last year. The
decreases in non-cash expenses during the three and nine month
periods compared to the same periods last year were primarily
related to graded vesting methodology used in determining
stock-based compensation expense relating to the Companys
stock options and restricted stock awards granted at the time of
the initial public offering. Cost of operations excluding
non-cash expense was $34,317 and $96,705 in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, or 34.2% and
35.7% of revenue, compared to $28,424 and $83,477, or 33.0% and
35.5% of revenue during the same periods last year. The
increases in absolute dollars, as well as the increases as a
percentage of revenue were primarily attributable to increases
in compensation-related costs due to higher staffing levels
relating to our Web site operations and development.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expense increased to $26,441 and $77,731 in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, from $22,459
and $67,258 in the same periods last year. As a percentage of
revenue, sales and marketing expense was 26.3% and 28.7% for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, compared to 26.1% and 28.6% during the same
periods last year. Included in sales and marketing expense were
non-cash expenses related to advertising of $178 and $1,736 in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
compared to $169 and $2,489 in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Non-cash advertising expense decreased
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
2007 due to lower utilization of our prepaid advertising
inventory. Also included in sales and marketing expense were
non-cash expenses related to stock-based compensation of $1,222
and $3,624 in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, compared to $1,252 and $3,889 in the same
periods last year. The decreases in non-cash stock-based
compensation expense were primarily related to graded vesting
methodology used in determining stock-based compensation expense
relating to the Companys stock options and restricted
stock awards granted at the time of the initial public offering.
Sales and marketing expense, excluding non-cash expenses, was
$25,041 and $72,371 or 24.9% and 26.7% of revenue in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively,
compared to $21,038 and $60,880 or 24.4% and 25.9% of revenue in
the same periods last year. The increases in absolute dollars,
as well as the increases as a percentage of revenue, were
primarily attributable to increases of approximately $2,800 and
$8,200 in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, in compensation-related costs due to
increased staffing and sales commissions related to higher
revenue.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expense decreased to $15,209 and $43,598 in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, from $15,388 and $46,874 in the same periods last
year. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative
expense was 15.2% and 16.1% for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to 17.9% and
19.9% during the same periods last year. Included in general and
administrative expense during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was non-cash stock-based compensation
expense of $1,348 and $4,201, respectively, compared to $2,838
and $7,544 in the same periods last year. The decreases in
non-cash stock-based compensation expense were primarily due to
graded vesting methodology used in determining stock-based
compensation expense relating to the Companys stock
options and restricted stock awards granted at the time of the
initial public offering. General and administrative expense,
excluding non-cash expenses, was $13,861 and $39,397 or 13.8%
and 14.5% of revenue in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $12,550 and
$39,330 or 14.6% and 16.7% of revenue in the same periods last
year. The increase in absolute dollars for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to an
increase of $1,000 in compensation-related costs due to
increased staffing.
Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities. Impairment of auction rate securities
represents a charge of $27,406 related to an other-than
temporary reduction of the fair value of the Companys
auction rate securities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. For additional information, see
Introduction Other Significant
Developments and Trends Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities; Non-Recourse Credit Facility above.
36
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expense increased to $7,133 and $21,106 in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, from $7,085 and $20,017 in the same periods last
year. The increases over the prior year periods were due to
increases of approximately $1,000 and $3,500 during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, in
depreciation expense resulting from capital expenditures made in
2007 and 2008, which was partially offset by a decrease in
amortization expense of approximately $1,000 and $2,400 during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, resulting from certain intangible assets becoming
fully amortized.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to
$2,616 and $8,419 in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, from $3,486 and $8,522 in
the same periods last year. The decreases in the three and nine
month periods resulted from a decrease in the average interest
rate of the Companys investments.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision
of $8,132 and $16,385 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, and income tax provision
of $3,129 and $4,671 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, represent tax expense
related to federal, state and other jurisdictions. As a result
of the reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance during
the three months ended December 31, 2007, the income tax
provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
reflects a normal tax rate provision based on the statutory
rates, and accordingly, includes a non-cash provision. The
increase in the effective tax rate from the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is a result of this non-cash provision.
The income tax provision for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 excludes a benefit for the impairment of
ARS, as it is currently not deductible for tax purposes.
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of
Tax. (Loss) income from discontinued operations,
net of tax, represents the ACS/ACP Business net operating (loss)
income of ($10) and $210 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with the
completed sale of the ACS/ACP Business.
Results
of Operations by Operating Segment
We monitor the performance of our business based on earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other
non-cash items. Other non-cash items include non-cash
advertising expense and non-cash stock-based compensation
expense. Corporate and other overhead functions are allocated to
segments on a specifically identifiable basis or other
reasonable method of allocation. We consider these allocations
to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of costs
incurred. We do not disaggregate assets for internal management
reporting and, therefore, such information is not presented.
There are no inter-segment revenue transactions.
37
The following table presents the results of our operations for
each of our operating segments and a reconciliation to income
(loss) from continuing operations:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and sponsorship
|
|
$
|
72,046
|
|
|
$
|
59,087
|
|
|
$
|
190,494
|
|
|
$
|
158,944
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
22,139
|
|
|
|
20,001
|
|
|
|
65,928
|
|
|
|
59,915
|
|
|
Content syndication and other
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Online Services
|
|
|
94,577
|
|
|
|
79,578
|
|
|
|
257,576
|
|
|
|
220,886
|
|
|
Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
5,810
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
14,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,387
|
|
|
$
|
86,098
|
|
|
$
|
271,245
|
|
|
$
|
235,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization
and other non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online Services
|
|
$
|
25,956
|
|
|
$
|
21,948
|
|
|
$
|
61,287
|
|
|
$
|
48,982
|
|
|
Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,168
|
|
|
|
24,086
|
|
|
|
62,772
|
|
|
|
51,625
|
|
|
Interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other
non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
8,419
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,133
|
)
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
(21,106
|
)
|
|
|
(20,017
|
)
|
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,736
|
)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,575
|
)
|
|
|
(5,687
|
)
|
|
|
(10,775
|
)
|
|
|
(15,592
|
)
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(8,132
|
)
|
|
|
(3,129
|
)
|
|
|
(16,385
|
)
|
|
|
(4,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
|
17,378
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,492
|
|
|
$
|
(6,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion is a comparison of the results of
operations for our two operating segments for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Online Services. Revenues were $94,577, and
$257,576 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, an increase of $14,999 and $36,690 or 18.8%
and 16.6% from the same periods last year. Advertising and
sponsorship revenue increased $12,959 or 21.9% and $31,550 or
19.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. The
increases in advertising and sponsorship revenue were
attributable to an increase in the number of unique sponsored
programs on our sites, including both brand sponsorship and
educational programs. The number of such programs grew to
approximately 800 compared to approximately 500 last year. In
general, pricing remained relatively stable for our advertising
and sponsorship programs and was not a significant source of the
revenue increase. Licensing revenue increased $2,138 or 10.7%
and $6,013 or 10.0% for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same
periods last year. These increases were due to an increase in
the number of companies using our private portal platform to 129
from 112 last year. In general, pricing remained relatively
stable for our private portal licenses and was not a significant
source of the revenue increase. We also have approximately 140
additional customers who purchase stand-alone decision-support
services from us. Content syndication and other revenue
decreased to $392 and $1,154 during the three and nine months
ended
38
September 30, 2008, respectively, from $490 and $2,027
during the same periods last year, primarily as a result of the
completion of certain contracts and our decision not to seek new
content syndication business.
Our Online Services earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items was $25,956
and $61,287 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, or 27.4% and 23.8% of
revenue, respectively, compared to $21,948 and $48,982 or 27.6%
and 22.2% of revenue in the same periods last year. The increase
as a percentage of revenue in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was due to higher revenue from the
increase in the number of brands and sponsored programs in our
public portals as well as the increase in companies using our
private online portal without incurring a proportionate increase
in overall expenses.
Publishing and Other Services. Revenues were
$5,810 and $13,669 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $6,520 and
$14,426 in the same periods last year. The decrease in the three
month period ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
attributable to $698 of lower advertising in The Little Blue
Book. The decrease in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2008 was attributable to $1,503 of lower
advertising in The Little Blue Book, partially offset by
$746 of higher advertising in WebMD the Magazine. In
general, pricing remained relatively stable for advertising in
both The Little Blue Book and WebMD the Magazine
and was not a significant source for changes in revenue.
Our Publishing and Other Services earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items was
$1,212 and $1,485 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, compared to $2,138 and $2,643 during
the same periods last year. These decreases were primarily
attributable to lower advertising as noted above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2008, we had $199,752 of cash and cash
equivalents and we owned investments in ARS with a face value of
$165,500 and a fair value of $132,848. While liquidity for our
ARS investments is currently limited, we recently entered into a
non-recourse credit facility with Citigroup that will allow us
to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of our ARS holdings. See
Introduction Other Significant
Developments and Trends Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities and Introduction
Recent or Pending Transactions Credit Facility
above. Our working capital as of September 30, 2008 was
$317,893. Our working capital is affected by the timing of each
period end in relation to items such as payments received from
customers, payments made to vendors, and internal payroll and
billing cycles, as well as the seasonality within our business.
Accordingly, our working capital, and its impact on cash flow
from operations, can fluctuate materially from period to period.
Cash provided by operating activities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $80,752, as a result of net
loss of $6,217, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $76,193, which
included depreciation and amortization, non-cash advertising
expense, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, deferred and
other income taxes and the impairment of auction rate
securities. Additionally, changes in working capital provided
cash flow of $10,776, primarily due to a decrease in accounts
receivable of $7,933, an increase in deferred revenue of $5,339,
partially offset by an increase in other assets of $2,652 and a
decrease in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of
$407. Cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
was $72,809, as a result of net income of $17,588, adjusted for
income from discontinued operations of $210 and non-cash
expenses of $40,073, which included depreciation and
amortization, non-cash advertising expense, deferred income
taxes and non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
Additionally, changes in working capital provided cash flow of
$15,358, primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable of
$14,648, an increase in deferred revenue of $3,253, and an
increase in amounts due to HLTH of $5,223, partially offset by a
decrease in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of
$7,463.
Cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was $98,521 which related to net
purchases of available-for-sale securities of $84,600 and
investments in property and equipment of $15,054 primarily to
enhance our technology platform, partially offset by cash
received from the sale of the ACS/ACP Business of $985. Cash
used in investing activities during the nine months ended
September 30,
39
2007 was $103,984 which related to net purchases of
available-for-sale securities of $90,410 and investments in
property and equipment of $13,574 primarily to enhance our
technology platform.
Cash provided by financing activities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 related to proceeds from the
issuance of common stock of $3,453 and a tax benefit related to
stock option deductions of $315. Cash provided by financing
activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
principally related to net cash transfers with HLTH of $155,119,
which included $149,862 received from HLTH related to the
utilization of the Companys net operating losses, a tax
benefit related to stock option deductions of $655 and proceeds
from the issuance of common stock of $8,490.
Potential future cash commitments include our anticipated 2008
capital expenditure requirements for the full year, which we
currently estimate to be up to $25,000. Our anticipated capital
expenditures relate to improvements that will be deployed across
our public and private portal web sites in order to enable us to
service future growth in unique users, page views and private
portal customers, as well as to create new sponsorship areas for
our customers. In addition, WebMD entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire MTS. See
Introduction Recent or Pending
Transactions Pending Acquisition of Marketing
Technology Solutions Inc. above. The pending acquisition
will result in $50,000 in cash, payable at closing, and payment
of up to an additional $25,000 in cash if certain performance
thresholds are achieved relating to calendar year 2009.
We believe that our available cash resources and future cash
flow from operations will provide sufficient cash resources to
meet the commitments described above and to fund our currently
anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements
for up to twenty-four months. Our future liquidity and capital
requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including
retention of customers at current volume and revenue levels,
implementation of new or updated application and service
offerings, competing technological and market developments, and
potential future acquisitions. In addition, our ability to
generate cash flow is subject to numerous factors beyond our
control, including general economic, regulatory and other
matters affecting us and our customers. We plan to continue to
enhance our online services and to continue to invest in
acquisitions, strategic relationships, facilities, technological
infrastructure and product development. We intend to grow our
existing businesses and enter into complementary ones through
both internal investments and acquisitions. We may need to raise
additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced
applications and services, respond to competitive pressures,
acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take
advantage of unanticipated opportunities. If required, we may
raise such additional funds through public or private debt or
equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements.
We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on
acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be
dilutive to our stockholders. Future indebtedness may impose
various restrictions and covenants on us that could limit our
ability to respond to market conditions, to provide for
unanticipated capital investments or to take advantage of
business opportunities.
Factors
That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of
Operations
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a
negative effect on our financial results or operations or that
could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of
our businesses. The occurrence of one or more of the
circumstances or events described below could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows or on the trading prices of our Class A
Common Stock or securities we may issue in the future. The risks
and uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report are not the
only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that are
not currently known to us or that we currently believe are
immaterial may also adversely affect our business and operations.
40
Risks
Related to Our Operations and Financial Performance
If we are
unable to provide content and services that attract and retain
users to The WebMD Health Network on a consistent basis, our
advertising and sponsorship revenue could be reduced
Users of The WebMD Health Network have numerous other
online and offline sources of healthcare information services.
Our ability to compete for user traffic on our public portals
depends upon our ability to make available a variety of health
and medical content, decision-support applications and other
services that meet the needs of a variety of types of users,
including consumers, physicians and other healthcare
professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking
information. Our ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
|
|
|
| |
|
our ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists
and independent writers;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to license quality content from third
parties; and
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in
user interest in specific topics.
|
We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to develop
or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a
reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of our public
portals may be attracted to The WebMD Health Network as a
result of a specific condition or for a specific purpose, it is
difficult for us to predict the rate at which they will return
to the public portals. Because we generate revenue by, among
other things, selling sponsorships of specific pages, sections
or events on The WebMD Health Network, a decline in user
traffic levels or a reduction in the number of pages viewed by
users could cause our revenue to decrease and could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Developing
and implementing new and updated applications, features and
services for our public and private portals may be more
difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than
expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue
to justify the costs
Attracting and retaining users of our public portals and clients
for our private portals requires us to continue to improve the
technology underlying those portals and to continue to develop
new and updated applications, features and services for those
portals. If we are unable to do so on a timely basis or if we
are unable to implement new applications, features and services
without disruption to our existing ones, we may lose potential
users and clients.
We rely on a combination of internal development, strategic
relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop our portals
and related applications, features and services. Our development
and/or
implementation of new technologies, applications, features and
services may cost more than expected, may take longer than
originally expected, may require more testing than originally
anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional
personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that
the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies,
applications, features or services will justify the amounts
spent.
We face
significant competition for our products and services
The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive,
continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change.
|
|
|
| |
|
Our public portals face competition from numerous other
companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue
from advertisers and sponsors. We compete for users with online
services and Web sites that provide health-related information,
including both commercial sites and not-for-profit sites. We
compete for advertisers and sponsors with: health-related Web
sites; general purpose consumer Web sites that offer specialized
health sub-channels; other high-traffic Web sites that include
both healthcare-related and non-healthcare-related content and
services; search engines that provide specialized health search;
and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple
sites.
|
| |
| |
|
Our private portals compete with: providers of healthcare
decision-support tools and online health management
applications; wellness and disease management vendors; and
health information services and health management offerings of
healthcare benefits companies and their affiliates.
|
41
|
|
|
| |
|
Our Publishing and Other Services segments products and
services compete with numerous other offline publications, some
of which have better access to traditional distribution channels
than we have, and also compete with online information sources.
|
Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical,
product development, marketing and other resources than we do.
These organizations may be better known than we are and have
more customers or users than we do. We cannot provide assurance
that we will be able to compete successfully against these
organizations or any alliances they have formed or may form.
Since there are no substantial barriers to entry into the
markets in which our public portals participate, we expect that
competitors will continue to enter these markets.
Failure
to maintain and enhance the WebMD brand could have a
material adverse effect on our business
We believe that the WebMD brand identity that we
have developed has contributed to the success of our business
and has helped us achieve recognition as a trusted source of
health and wellness information. We also believe that
maintaining and enhancing that brand is important to expanding
the user base for our public portals, to our relationships with
sponsors and advertisers and to our ability to gain additional
employer and healthcare payer clients for our private portals.
We have expended considerable resources on establishing and
enhancing the WebMD brand and our other brands, and
we have developed policies and procedures designed to preserve
and enhance our brands, including editorial procedures designed
to provide quality control of the information we publish. We
expect to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain
and enhance our brands. However, we may not be able to
successfully maintain or enhance awareness of our brands, and
events outside of our control may have a negative effect on our
brands. If we are unable to maintain or enhance awareness of our
brand, and do so in a cost-effective manner, our business could
be adversely affected.
Our
online businesses have a limited operating history
Our online businesses have a limited operating history and
participate in relatively new markets. These markets, and our
online businesses, have undergone significant changes during
their short history and can be expected to continue to change.
Many companies with business plans based on providing healthcare
information and related services through the Internet have
failed to be profitable and some have filed for bankruptcy
and/or
ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot
assure you that our businesses will continue to be profitable.
Our
failure to attract and retain qualified executives and employees
may have a material adverse effect on our business
Our business depends largely on the skills, experience and
performance of key members of our management team. We also
depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified
writers and editors, software developers and other technical
personnel and sales and marketing personnel. Competition for
qualified personnel in the healthcare information services and
Internet industries is intense. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified
personnel to meet our requirements, or that we will be able to
do so at salary and benefit costs that are acceptable to us.
Failure to do so may have an adverse effect on our business.
If we are
unable to provide healthcare content for our offline
publications that attracts and retains users, our revenue will
be reduced
Interest in our offline publications, such as The Little Blue
Book, is based upon our ability to make available up-to-date
health content that meets the needs of our physician users.
Although we have been able to continue to update and maintain
the physician practice information that we publish in The
Little Blue Book, if we are unable to continue to do so for
any reason, the value of The Little Blue Book would
diminish and interest in this publication and advertising in
this publication would be adversely affected.
42
WebMD the Magazine was launched in April 2005 and, as a
result, has a very short operating history. We cannot assure you
that WebMD the Magazine will be able to attract and
retain the advertisers needed to make this publication
successful in the future.
The
timing of our advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter
Our advertising and sponsorship revenue, which accounted for
approximately 73% of our total Online Services segment revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2007, may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of
factors, many of which are not in our control, and some of which
may be difficult to forecast accurately. The majority of our
advertising and sponsorship programs are for terms of
approximately four to twelve months. We have relatively few
longer term advertising and sponsorship programs. In addition,
we have noted a trend this year, among some of our advertisers
and sponsors, of seeking to enter into shorter term contracts
than they had entered into in the past. We cannot assure you
that our current advertisers and sponsors will continue to use
our services beyond the terms of their existing contracts or
that they will enter into any additional contracts.
In addition, the time between the date of initial contact with a
potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and
the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for
that program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts,
and may be subject to delays over which we have little or no
control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the
advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals.
Other factors that could affect the timing of contracting for
specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of
revenue under such contracts, include:
|
|
|
| |
|
the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved
uses for existing products;
|
| |
| |
|
the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with
existing brand name products;
|
| |
| |
|
the timing of withdrawals of products from the market;
|
| |
| |
|
seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health
conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing
of promotional campaigns for specific products; and
|
| |
| |
|
the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other
healthcare professionals.
|
Lengthy
sales and implementation cycles for our private online portals
make it difficult to forecast our revenues from these
applications and may have an adverse impact on our
business
The period from our initial contact with a potential client for
a private online portal and the first purchase of our solution
by the client is difficult to predict. In the past, this period
has generally ranged from six to twelve months, but in some
cases has been longer. Potential sales may be subject to delays
or cancellations due to a clients internal procedures for
approving large expenditures and other factors beyond our
control, including the effect of general economic conditions on
the willingness of potential clients to commit to licensing our
private portals. The time it takes to implement a private online
portal is also difficult to predict and has lasted as long as
six months from contract execution to the commencement of live
operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the
availability of the internal resources of the client that are
needed and other factors outside of our control. As a result, we
have limited ability to forecast the timing of revenue from new
clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult to predict our
financial performance from quarter to quarter.
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, we may
expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract
proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private
online portal without receiving any related revenue. In
addition, many of the expenses related to providing private
online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including
personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if
our private portal revenue is lower than expected, we may not be
able to reduce related short-term spending in response. Any
shortfall in such revenue would have a direct impact on our
results of operations.
43
Our
ability to provide comparative information on hospital cost and
quality depends on our ability to obtain the required data on a
timely basis and, if we are unable to do so, our private portal
services would be less attractive to clients
We provide, in connection with our private portal services,
comparative information about hospital cost and quality. Our
ability to provide this information depends on our ability to
obtain comprehensive, reliable data. We currently obtain this
data from a number of public and private sources, including the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 24 individual
states and the Leapfrog Group. We cannot provide assurance that
we would be able to find alternative sources for this data on
acceptable terms and conditions. Accordingly, our business could
be negatively impacted if CMS or our other data sources cease to
make such information available or impose terms and conditions
for making it available that are not consistent with our planned
usage. In addition, the quality of the comparative information
services we provide depends on the reliability of the
information that we are able to obtain. If the information we
use to provide these services contains errors or is otherwise
unreliable, we could lose clients and our reputation could be
damaged.
Our
ability to renew existing licenses with employers and health
plans will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to
increase usage of our private portal services by their employees
and plan members
In a healthcare market where a greater share of the
responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been
increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information
technology (including personal health records) to assist
consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also
increased. We believe that through our WebMD Health and Benefits
Manager tools, including our personal health record application,
we are well positioned to play a role in this consumer-directed
healthcare environment, and these services will be a significant
driver for the growth of our private portals during the next
several years. However, our growth strategy depends, in part, on
increasing usage of our private portal services by our employer
and health plan clients employees and members,
respectively. Increasing usage of our services requires us to
continue to deliver and improve the underlying technology and
develop new and updated applications, features and services. In
addition, we face competition in the area of healthcare
decision-support tools and online health management applications
and health information services. Many of our competitors have
greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and
other resources than we do, and may be better known than we are.
We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to meet our
development and implementation goals, nor that we will be able
to compete successfully against other vendors offering
competitive services and, as a result, may experience static or
diminished usage for our private portal services and possible
non-renewals of our license agreements.
Expansion
to markets outside the United States will subject us to
additional risks
One element of our growth strategy is to seek to expand our
online services to markets outside the United States.
Generally, we expect that we would accomplish this through
partnerships or joint ventures with other companies having
expertise in the specific country or region. However, our
participation in international markets will still be subject to
certain risks beyond those applicable to our operations in the
United States, such as:
|
|
|
| |
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations outside of the
United States;
|
| |
| |
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
| |
| |
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of legal, regulatory
and market requirements;
|
| |
| |
|
variability of economic and political conditions;
|
| |
| |
|
tariffs or other trade barriers;
|
| |
| |
|
costs of providing and marketing products and services in
different markets;
|
| |
| |
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on
repatriation of earnings; and
|
| |
| |
|
difficulties in protecting intellectual property.
|
44
Risks
Related to Our Relationships with Clients
Developments
in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our
business
Most of our revenue is derived from the healthcare industry and
could be affected by changes affecting healthcare spending. We
are particularly dependent on pharmaceutical, biotechnology and
medical device companies for our advertising and sponsorship
revenue.
General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry
participants could result from, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
|
government regulation or private initiatives that affect the
manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients,
payers or other healthcare industry participants, including
changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products
and services;
|
| |
| |
|
consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
|
| |
| |
|
reductions in governmental funding for healthcare; and
|
| |
| |
|
adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting
healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical, biotechnology or
medical device companies or other healthcare industry
participants.
|
Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the
same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may
result in reduced spending in some or all of the specific market
segments that we serve or are planning to serve. For example,
use of our products and services could be affected by:
|
|
|
| |
|
changes in the design of health insurance plans;
|
| |
| |
|
a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming
to market; and
|
| |
| |
|
decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical or medical
device companies, including as a result of governmental
regulation or private initiatives that discourage or prohibit
advertising or sponsorship activities by pharmaceutical or
medical device companies.
|
In addition, our customers expectations regarding pending
or potential industry developments may also affect their
budgeting processes and spending plans with respect to products
and services of the types we provide.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent
years and we expect that significant changes will continue to
occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the
healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure
you that the markets for our products and services will continue
to exist at current levels or that we will have adequate
technical, financial and marketing resources to react to changes
in those markets.
We may be
unsuccessful in our efforts to increase advertising and
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies
Most of our advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in the
past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
companies. We have been focusing on increasing sponsorship
revenue from consumer products companies that are interested in
communicating health-related or safety-related information about
their products to our audience. However, while a number of
consumer products companies have indicated an intent to increase
the portion of their promotional spending used on the Internet,
we cannot assure you that these advertisers and sponsors will
find our consumer Web sites to be as effective as other Web
sites or traditional media for promoting their products and
services. If we encounter difficulties in competing with the
other alternatives available to consumer products companies,
this portion of our business may develop more slowly than we
expect or may fail to develop.
45
We could
be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by clients of
our online portals if the software and systems we use to provide
them contain errors or experience failures
Errors in the software and systems we use could cause serious
problems for clients of our online portals. We may fail to meet
contractual performance standards or client expectations.
Clients of our online portals may seek compensation from us or
may seek to terminate their agreements with us, withhold
payments due to us, seek refunds from us of part or all of the
fees charged under those agreements or initiate litigation or
other dispute resolution procedures. In addition, we could face
breach of warranty or other claims by clients or additional
development costs. Our software and systems are inherently
complex and, despite testing and quality control, we cannot be
certain that they will perform as planned.
We attempt to limit, by contract, our liability to our clients
for damages arising from our negligence, errors or mistakes.
However, contractual limitations on liability may not be
enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not
provide sufficient protection to us from liability for damages.
We maintain liability insurance coverage, including coverage for
errors and omissions. However, it is possible that claims could
exceed the amount of our applicable insurance coverage, if any,
or that this coverage may not continue to be available on
acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts. Even if these claims
do not result in liability to us, investigating and defending
against them would be expensive and time consuming and could
divert managements attention away from our operations. In
addition, negative publicity caused by these events may delay or
hinder market acceptance of our services, including unrelated
services.
Risks
Related to Use of the Internet and to Our Technological
Infrastructure
Any
service interruption or failure in the systems that we use to
provide online services could harm our business
Our online services are designed to operate 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, without interruption. However, we have
experienced and expect that we will in the future experience
interruptions and delays in services and availability from time
to time. We rely on internal systems as well as third-party
vendors, including data center providers and bandwidth
providers, to provide our online services. We may not maintain
redundant systems or facilities for some of these services. In
the event of a catastrophic event with respect to one or more of
these systems or facilities, we may experience an extended
period of system unavailability, which could negatively impact
our relationship with users. In addition, system failures may
result in loss of data, including user registration data,
content, and other data critical to the operation of our online
services, which could cause significant harm to our business and
our reputation.
To operate without interruption or loss of data, both we and our
service providers must guard against:
|
|
|
| |
|
damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
|
| |
| |
|
communications failures;
|
| |
| |
|
software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
|
| |
| |
|
security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive
problems; and
|
| |
| |
|
other potential service interruptions.
|
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services
provided by third-party providers to us or any failure by these
third-party providers or our own systems to handle current or
higher volume of use could significantly harm our business. We
exercise little control over these third-party vendors, which
increases our vulnerability to problems with services they
provide.
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in
connection with these third-party technologies and information
services or our own systems could negatively impact our
relationships with users and adversely affect our brand and our
business and could expose us to liabilities to third parties.
Although we maintain insurance for our business, the coverage
under our policies may not be adequate to compensate us
46
for all losses that may occur. In addition, we cannot provide
assurance that we will continue to be able to obtain adequate
insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
Implementation
of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms
used to deliver our online services may result in performance
problems and may not provide the additional functionality that
was expected
From time to time, we implement additions to or changes in the
hardware and software platforms we use for providing our online
services. During and after the implementation of additions or
changes, a platform may not perform as expected, which could
result in interruptions in operations, an increase in response
time or an inability to track performance metrics. In addition,
in connection with integrating acquired businesses, we may move
their operations to our hardware and software platforms or make
other changes, any of which could result in interruptions in
those operations. Any significant interruption in our ability to
operate any of our online services could have an adverse effect
on our relationships with users and clients and, as a result, on
our financial results. We rely on a combination of purchasing,
licensing, internal development, and acquisitions to develop our
hardware and software platforms. Our implementation of additions
to or changes in these platforms may cost more than originally
expected, may take longer than originally expected, and may
require more testing than originally anticipated. In addition,
we cannot provide assurance that additions to or changes in
these platforms will provide the additional functionality and
other benefits that were originally expected.
If the
systems we use to provide online portals experience security
breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, our business
could suffer
We retain and transmit confidential information, including
personal health records, in the processing centers and other
facilities we use to provide online services. It is critical
that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be
perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach could
damage our reputation or result in liability. We may be required
to expend significant capital and other resources to protect
against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate problems
caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of security
measures, this infrastructure or other systems that we interface
with, including the Internet and related systems, may be
vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or
contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors,
denial-of-service attacks or other attacks by third parties or
similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of our security,
whether as a result of our own systems or the systems that they
interface with, could reduce demand for our services and could
subject us to legal claims from our clients and users, including
for breach of contract or breach of warranty.
Our
online services are dependent on the development and maintenance
of the Internet infrastructure
Our ability to deliver our online services is dependent on the
development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the
Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a
variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to
portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and
delays in the future. The Internet has also experienced, and is
likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the
number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet
continues to experience increased usage, the Internet
infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on
it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet
may be harmed by increased usage or by denial-of-service
attacks. Any resulting interruptions in our services or
increases in response time could, if significant, result in a
loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and
sponsors on our Web sites and, if sustained or repeated, could
reduce the attractiveness of our services.
Customers who utilize our online services depend on Internet
service providers and other Web site operators for access to our
Web sites. All of these providers have experienced significant
outages in the past and could experience outages, delays and
other difficulties in the future due to system failures
unrelated to our systems. Any such outages or other failures on
their part could reduce traffic to our Web sites.
47
Risks
Related to the Legal and Regulatory Environment in Which We
Operate
Government
regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with
respect to our compliance efforts and our business
strategies
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to
changing political, legislative, regulatory and other
influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the
healthcare industry could create unexpected liabilities for us,
could cause us to incur additional costs and could restrict our
operations. Many healthcare laws are complex, and their
application to specific products and services may not be clear.
In particular, many existing healthcare laws and regulations,
when enacted, did not anticipate the healthcare information
services that we provide. However, these laws and regulations
may nonetheless be applied to our products and services. Our
failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws
and regulations, or other failure to comply, could create
liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively
affect our businesses. Some of the risks we face from healthcare
regulation are as follows:
|
|
|
| |
|
Regulation of Drug and Medical Device Advertising and
Promotion. The WebMD Health Network
provides services involving advertising and promotion of
prescription and over-the-counter drugs and medical devices. If
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) finds that any information on The WebMD
Health Network or in WebMD the Magazine violates FDA
or FTC regulations, they may take regulatory or judicial action
against us
and/or the
advertiser or sponsor of that information. State attorneys
general may also take similar action based on their states
consumer protection statutes. Any increase or change in
regulation of drug or medical device advertising and promotion
could make it more difficult for us to contract for sponsorships
and advertising. Members of Congress, physician groups and
others have criticized the FDAs current policies, and have
called for restrictions on advertising of prescription drugs to
consumers and increased FDA enforcement. We cannot predict what
actions the FDA or industry participants may take in response to
these criticisms. It is also possible that new laws would be
enacted that impose restrictions on such advertising. Our
advertising and sponsorship revenue could be materially reduced
by additional restrictions on the advertising of prescription
drugs and medical devices to consumers, whether imposed by law
or regulation or required under policies adopted by industry
members.
|
| |
| |
|
Anti-kickback Laws. There are federal and
state laws that govern patient referrals, physician financial
relationships and inducements to healthcare providers and
patients. The federal healthcare programs anti-kickback
law prohibits any person or entity from offering, paying,
soliciting or receiving anything of value, directly or
indirectly, for the referral of patients covered by Medicare,
Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs or the leasing,
purchasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the lease,
purchase or order of any item, good, facility or service covered
by these programs. Many states also have similar anti-kickback
laws that are not necessarily limited to items or services for
which payment is made by a federal healthcare program. These
laws are applicable to manufacturers and distributors and,
therefore, may restrict how we and some of our customers market
products to healthcare providers, including e-details. Any
determination by a state or federal regulatory agency that any
of our practices violate any of these laws could subject us to
civil or criminal penalties and require us to change or
terminate some portions of our business and could have an
adverse effect on our business. Even an unsuccessful challenge
by regulatory authorities of our practices could result in
adverse publicity and be costly for us to respond to.
|
| |
| |
|
Medical Professional Regulation. The practice
of most healthcare professions requires licensing under
applicable state law. In addition, the laws in some states
prohibit business entities from practicing medicine. If a state
determines that some portion of our business violates these
laws, it may seek to have us discontinue those portions or
subject us to penalties or licensure requirements. Any
determination that we are a healthcare provider and have acted
improperly as a healthcare provider may result in liability to
us.
|
48
Government
regulation of the Internet could adversely affect our
business
The Internet and its associated technologies are subject to
government regulation. Our failure, or the failure of our
business partners or third-party service providers, to
accurately anticipate the application of laws and regulations
affecting our products and services and the manner in which we
deliver them, or any other failure to comply with such laws and
regulations, could create liability for us, result in adverse
publicity and negatively affect our business. In addition, new
laws and regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws
and regulations, may be adopted with respect to the Internet or
other online services covering user privacy, patient
confidentiality, consumer protection and other issues, including
pricing, content, copyrights and patents, distribution and
characteristics and quality of products and services. We cannot
predict whether these laws or regulations will change or how
such changes will affect our business.
We face
potential liability related to the privacy and security of
personal information we collect from or on behalf of users of
our services
Privacy of personal health information, particularly personal
health information stored or transmitted electronically, is a
major issue in the United States. The Privacy Standards under
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(or HIPAA) establish a set of basic national privacy standards
for the protection of individually identifiable health
information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and
healthcare providers (referred to as covered entities) and their
business associates. Only covered entities are directly subject
to potential civil and criminal liability under the Privacy
Standards. Accordingly, the Privacy Standards do not apply
directly to us. However, portions of our business, such as those
managing employee or plan member health information for
employers or health plans, are or may be business associates of
covered entities and are bound by certain contracts and
agreements to use and disclose protected health information in a
manner consistent with the Privacy Standards. Depending on the
facts and circumstances, we could potentially be subject to
criminal liability for aiding and abetting or conspiring with a
covered entity to violate the Privacy Standards. We cannot
assure you that we will adequately address the risks created by
the Privacy Standards. In addition, we are unable to predict
what changes to the Privacy Standards might be made in the
future or how those changes could affect our business. Any new
legislation or regulation in the area of privacy of personal
information, including personal health information, could also
affect the way we operate our business and could harm our
business.
In addition, Internet user privacy and the use of consumer
information to track online activities are major issues both in
the United States and abroad. For example, in December 2007, the
FTC published for comment proposed principles to govern tracking
of consumers activities online in order to deliver
advertising targeted to the interests of individual consumers.
We have privacy policies posted on our Web sites that we believe
comply with applicable laws requiring notice to users about our
information collection, use and disclosure practices. However,
whether and how existing privacy and consumer protection laws in
various jurisdictions apply to the Internet is still uncertain.
We also notify users about our information collection, use and
disclosure practices relating to data we receive through offline
means such as paper health risk assessments. We cannot assure
you that the privacy policies and other statements we provide to
users of our products and services, or our practices will be
found sufficient to protect us from liability or adverse
publicity in this area. A determination by a state or federal
agency or court that any of our practices do not meet applicable
standards, or the implementation of new standards or
requirements, could adversely affect our business.
Failure
to maintain our CME accreditation could adversely affect
Medscapes ability to provide online CME
offerings
Medscapes continuing medical education (or CME) activities
are planned and implemented in accordance with the current
Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education, or ACCME, which oversees providers
of CME credit, and other applicable accreditation standards. In
2007, ACCME revised its standards for commercial support of CME.
The revised standards are intended to ensure, among other
things, that CME activities of ACCME-accredited providers, such
as Medscape, are independent of commercial
interests, which are now defined as entities that produce,
market, re-sell or distribute healthcare goods and services,
excluding certain organizations. Commercial
interests, and entities owned or
49
controlled by commercial interests, are ineligible
for accreditation by the ACCME. The revised standards also
provide that accredited CME providers may not place their CME
content on Web sites owned or controlled by a commercial
interest. In addition, accredited CME providers may no
longer ask commercial interests for speaker or topic
suggestions, and are also prohibited from asking
commercial interests to review CME content prior to
delivery.
As a result of the revised standards, we have made certain
adjustments to our corporate structure, management and
operations intended to ensure that Medscape will continue to
provide CME activities that are developed independently from
those programs developed by its sister companies, which may not
be independent of commercial interests. ACCME
required accredited providers to implement changes relating to
placing CME content on Web sites owned or controlled by
commercial interests by January 1, 2008 and is
requiring accredited providers to implement any corporate
structural changes necessary to meet the revised standards
regarding the definition of commercial interest by
August 2009. We believe that the adjustments that we and
Medscape have made to our structure and operations satisfy the
revised standards.
In June 2008, the ACCME announced a
call-for-comments on several ACCME proposals,
including the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Potential New Paradigm for Commercial Support:
The ACCME has stated that it believes that due
consideration should be given to the possibility of eliminating
commercial support of CME. The ACCME has requested the medical
profession, the public and CME providers to weigh in on the
debate on this subject. To frame the debate, the ACCME has
proposed several possible scenarios: (a) maintaining the
current system of commercial support; (b) completely
eliminating commercial support; (c) a new paradigm that
provides for commercial support if the following conditions are
met: (1) educational needs are identified and verified by
organizations that do not receive commercial support and are
free of financial relationships with industry; (2) if the
CME addresses a professional practice gap of a particular group
of learners that is corroborated by bona fide performance
measurements of the learners own practice; (3) the
CME content is from a continuing education curriculum specified
by a bona fide organization or entity; and (4) the CME is
verified as free of commercial bias; and (d) an alternative
new paradigm in which the four conditions described above would
provide a basis for a mechanism to distribute commercial support
derived from industry-donated, pooled funds.
|
| |
| |
|
Defining Appropriate Interactions between ACCME Accredited
Providers and Commercial Supporters. The ACCME
has proposed that: (a) accredited providers must not
receive communications from commercial interests announcing or
prescribing any specific content that would be a preferred, or
sought-after, topic for commercially supported CME (e.g.,
therapeutic area, product-line, patho-physiology); and
(b) receiving communications from commercial interests
regarding a commercial interests internal criteria for
providing commercial support would also not be permissible.
|
The ACCME sought comments on the above, and the comment period
ended to end on September 12, 2008. The comments submitted
to the ACCME indicated significant backing from the medical
profession for commercially-supported CME and, accordingly, we
believe that it is unlikely that a proposal for complete
elimination of such support would be adopted. However, we cannot
predict the ultimate outcome of the process, including what
other alternatives may be considered by ACCME as a result of
comments it has received. The elimination of, or restrictions
on, commercial support for CME could adversely affect the volume
of sponsored online CME programs implemented through our Web
sites.
Medscapes current ACCME accreditation expires at the end
of July 2010. In order for Medscape to renew its accreditation,
it will be required to demonstrate to the ACCME that it
continues to meet ACCME requirements. If Medscape fails to
maintain its status as an accredited ACCME provider (whether at
the time of such renewal or at an earlier time as a result of a
failure to comply with existing or additional ACCME standards),
it would not be permitted to accredit ACCME activities for
physicians and other healthcare professionals. Instead, it would
be required to use third parties to provide such CME-related
services. That, in turn, could discourage potential sponsors
from engaging Medscape to develop CME or education-related
activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
50
Government
regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the
volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through our
Web sites or require changes to how Medscape offers
CME
CME activities may be subject to government regulation by
Congress, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services,
the federal agency responsible for interpreting certain federal
laws relating to healthcare, and by state regulatory agencies.
Medscape
and/or the
sponsors of the CME activities that Medscape accredits may be
subject to enforcement actions if any of these CME activities
are deemed improperly promotional, potentially leading to the
termination of sponsorships.
During the past several years, educational activities, including
CME, directed at physicians have been subject to increased
governmental scrutiny to ensure that sponsors do not influence
or control the content of the activities. In response,
pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have
developed and implemented internal controls and procedures that
promote adherence to applicable regulations and requirements. In
implementing these controls and procedures, Medscapes
various sponsors may interpret the regulations and requirements
differently and may implement varying procedures or
requirements. These controls and procedures:
|
|
|
| |
|
may discourage pharmaceutical companies from providing grants
for independent educational activities;
|
| |
| |
|
may slow their internal approval for such grants;
|
| |
| |
|
may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs that
Medscape produces to levels that are lower than in the past,
thereby reducing revenue; and
|
| |
| |
|
may require Medscape to make changes to how it offers or
provides educational programs, including CME.
|
In addition, future changes to laws and regulations, or to the
internal compliance programs of supporters or supporters, may
further discourage, significantly limit, or prohibit supporters
or potential supporters from engaging in educational activities
with Medscape, or may require Medscape to make further changes
in the way it offers or provides educational programs.
We may
not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and
proprietary rights
Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important
to our businesses. The steps that we take to protect our
intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets
may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not adequate, may be
expensive. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent and
other intellectual property laws and confidentiality procedures
and non-disclosure contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement
of our intellectual property, proprietary information or trade
secrets. Even if we detect misappropriation or infringement by a
third party, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
enforce our rights at a reasonable cost, or at all. In addition,
our rights to intellectual property, proprietary information and
trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party
development and commercialization of competing products or
services.
Third
parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual
property, and we could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain
services, which may harm our business
We could be subject to claims that we are misappropriating or
infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of
others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be
expensive to defend and divert managements attention from
our operations. If we become liable to third parties for
infringing these rights, we could be required to pay a
substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing
technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or
services that use or contain the infringing intellectual
property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing products or
services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms,
or at all. We may also be required to indemnify our customers if
they become subject to third-party claims relating to
intellectual property that we license or otherwise provide to
them, which could be costly.
51
Third
parties may challenge the enforceability of our online
agreements
The law governing the validity and enforceability of online
agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. We
could be subject to claims by third parties that the online
terms and conditions for use of our Web sites, including
disclaimers or limitations of liability, are unenforceable. A
finding by a court that these terms and conditions or other
online agreements are invalid could harm our business.
We may be
subject to claims brought against us as a result of content we
provide
Consumers access health-related information through our online
services, including information regarding particular medical
conditions and possible adverse reactions or side effects from
medications. If our content, or content we obtain from third
parties, contains inaccuracies, it is possible that consumers,
employees, health plan members or others may sue us for various
causes of action. Although our Web sites contain terms and
conditions, including disclaimers of liability, that are
intended to reduce or eliminate our liability, the law governing
the validity and enforceability of online agreements and other
electronic transactions is evolving. We could be subject to
claims by third parties that our online agreements with
consumers and physicians that provide the terms and conditions
for use of our public or private portals are unenforceable. A
finding by a court that these agreements are invalid and that we
are subject to liability could harm our business and require
costly changes to our business.
We have editorial procedures in place to provide quality control
of the information that we publish or provide. However, we
cannot assure you that our editorial and other quality control
procedures will be sufficient to ensure that there are no errors
or omissions in particular content. Even if potential claims do
not result in liability to us, investigating and defending
against these claims could be expensive and time consuming and
could divert managements attention away from our
operations. In addition, our business is based on establishing
the reputation of our portals as trustworthy and dependable
sources of healthcare information. Allegations of impropriety or
inaccuracy, even if unfounded, could therefore harm our
reputation and business.
Risks
Related to the Relationship between WebMD and HLTH
The
concentrated ownership of our common stock by HLTH and certain
corporate governance arrangements prevent our other stockholders
from influencing significant corporate decisions
We have two classes of common stock:
|
|
|
| |
|
Class A Common Stock, which entitles the holder to one vote
per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders; and
|
| |
| |
|
Class B Common Stock, which entitles the holder to five
votes per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders.
|
HLTH owns 100% of our Class B Common Stock, which
represents approximately 83.1% of our outstanding common stock,
which includes the impact of shares to be issued pursuant to the
purchase agreement of Subimo, LLC. These Class B shares
collectively represent approximately 96% of the combined voting
power of our outstanding common stock. Given its ownership
interest, HLTH is able to control the outcome of all matters
submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the
election of directors. Accordingly, either in its capacity as a
stockholder or through its control of our Board of Directors,
HLTH is able to control all key decisions regarding our company,
including mergers or other business combinations and
acquisitions, dispositions of assets, future issuances of our
common stock or other securities, the incurrence of debt by us,
the payment of dividends on our common stock (including the
frequency and the amount of dividends that would be payable on
our common stock, a substantial majority of which HLTH owns) and
amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Further, as long as HLTH and its subsidiaries (excluding our
company and our subsidiaries) continue to beneficially own
shares representing at least a majority of the votes entitled to
be cast by the holders of our outstanding voting stock, it may
take actions required to be taken at a meeting of stockholders
without a meeting or a vote and without prior notice to holders
of our Class A Common Stock.
52
In addition, HLTHs controlling interest may discourage a
change of control that the holders of our Class A Common
Stock may favor. Any of these provisions could be used by HLTH
for its own advantage to the detriment of our other stockholders
and our company. This in turn may have an adverse effect on the
market price of our Class A Common Stock.
The
interests of HLTH may conflict with the interests of our other
stockholders
We cannot assure you that the interests of HLTH will coincide
with the interests of the other holders of our Common Stock. For
example, HLTH could cause us to make acquisitions that increase
the amount of our indebtedness or outstanding shares of common
stock or sell revenue-generating assets. Also, HLTH or its
directors and officers may allocate to HLTH or its other
affiliates corporate opportunities that could have been directed
to us. So long as HLTH continues to own shares of our Common
Stock with significant voting power, HLTH will continue to be
able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions.
Some of
our directors, officers and employees may have potential
conflicts of interest as a result of having positions with or
owning equity interests in HLTH
Martin J. Wygod, in addition to being Chairman of the Board of
our company, is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive
Officer of HLTH. Some of our other directors, officers and
employees also serve as directors, officers or employees of
HLTH. In addition, some of our directors, officers and employees
own shares of HLTHs Common Stock. Furthermore, because our
officers and employees have participated in HLTHs equity
compensation plans and because service at our company will, so
long as we are a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH, qualify
those persons for continued participation and continued vesting
of equity awards under HLTHs equity plans, many of our
officers and employees and some of our directors hold, and may
continue to hold, options to purchase HLTHs Common Stock
and shares of HLTHs Restricted Stock.
These arrangements and ownership interests or cash- or
equity-based awards could create, or appear to create, potential
conflicts of interest when directors or officers who own
HLTHs stock or stock options or who participate in
HLTHs benefit plans are faced with decisions that could
have different implications for HLTH than they do for us. We
cannot assure you that the provisions in our restated
certificate of incorporation will adequately address potential
conflicts of interest or that potential conflicts of interest
will be resolved in our favor.
Provisions
in our organizational documents and Delaware law may inhibit a
takeover, which could adversely affect the value of our
Class A Common Stock
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, as well as Delaware
corporate law, contain provisions that could delay or prevent a
change of control or changes in our management and Board of
Directors that holders of our Class A Common Stock might
consider favorable and may prevent them from receiving a
takeover premium for their shares. These provisions include, for
example, our classified board structure, the disproportionate
voting rights of the Class B Common Stock (relative to the
Class A Common Stock) and the authorization of our Board of
Directors to issue up to 50 million shares of preferred
stock without a stockholder vote. In addition, our Restated
Certificate of Incorporation provides that after the time HLTH
and its affiliates cease to own, in the aggregate, a majority of
the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock,
stockholders may not act by written consent and may not call
special meetings. These provisions apply even if an offer may be
considered beneficial by some of our stockholders. If a change
of control or change in management is delayed or prevented, the
market price of our Class A Common Stock could decline.
We may be
prevented from issuing stock to raise capital, to effectuate
acquisitions or to provide equity incentives to members of our
management and Board of Directors
Beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power
and value of our capital stock is required in order for HLTH to
continue to include us in its consolidated group for federal
income tax purposes, and beneficial ownership of at least 80% of
the total voting power of our capital stock and 80% of each
class of any non-voting capital stock that we may issue is
required in order for HLTH to effect a tax-free split-off,
53
spin-off or other similar transaction. Under the terms of the
tax sharing agreement that we have entered into with HLTH, we
have agreed that we will not knowingly take or fail to take any
action that could reasonably be expected to preclude HLTHs
ability to undertake a tax-free split-off or spin-off. This may
prevent us from issuing additional equity securities to raise
capital, to effectuate acquisitions or to provide management or
director equity incentives.
We are
included in HLTHs consolidated tax return and, as a
result, both we and HLTH may use each others net operating
loss carryforwards
Due to provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and
applicable Treasury regulations relating to the manner and order
in which net operating loss carryforwards are utilized when
filing consolidated tax returns, a portion of our net operating
loss carryforwards may be required to be utilized by HLTH before
HLTH would be permitted to utilize its own net operating loss
carryforwards. Correspondingly, in some situations, such as
where HLTHs net operating loss carryforwards were
generated first, we may be required to utilize a portion of
HLTHs net operating loss carryforwards before we would
have to utilize our own net operating loss carryforwards. On
October 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a termination
agreement, HLTH and the Company mutually agreed, in light of
recent turmoil in financial markets, to terminate the Agreement
and Plan of Merger between HLTH and WebMD. Under the Termination
Agreement, HLTH and the Company also agreed to amend the Amended
and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement dated as of February 15,
2006 between them (the Tax Sharing Agreement) so
that, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2007, HLTH
will no longer be required to reimburse the Company for use of
NOL carryforwards attributable to the Company that may result
from certain extraordinary transactions by HLTH. The Tax Sharing
Agreement has not, other than with respect to certain
extraordinary transactions by HLTH, required either HLTH or the
Company to reimburse the other party for any net tax savings
realized by the consolidated group as a result of the
groups utilization of the Companys or HLTHs
NOL carryforwards during the period of consolidation, and that
will continue following the amendment.
If
certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock or
HLTHs capital stock, we may be unable to utilize our net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to reduce our
income taxes
As of December 31, 2007, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $272 million for federal
income tax purposes and federal tax credits of approximately
$2.7 million, which excludes the impact of any unrecognized
tax benefits, residing within the WebMD legal entities. These
net operating loss carryforwards will be reduced by an aggregate
of approximately $120 million as a result of utilization to
offset HLTHs gains on the sale of its ViPS business on
July 22, 2008 and the sale of its remaining 48% interest in
Emdeon Business Services on February 8, 2008.
If certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock
or HLTHs capital stock, including issuances, redemptions,
recapitalizations, exercises of options, conversions of
convertible debt, purchases or sales by 5%-or-greater
shareholders and similar transactions, that result in a
cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of our
capital stock, over a three-year period, as determined under
rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and
applicable Treasury regulations, an annual limitation would be
imposed with respect to our ability to utilize our net operating
loss carryforwards and federal tax credits. The tender offer
being made by HLTH for its Common Stock that began on
October 27, 2008 may result in a cumulative change of
more than 50% of the ownership of our capital, as determined
under rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
and applicable Treasury regulations. However, we currently are
unable to calculate the annual limitation that would be imposed
on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards
and federal tax credits if such ownership change were to occur,
which would depend on various factors including the level of
participation in the tender offer. Because substantially all of
our net operating loss carryforwards are reserved for by a
valuation allowance, we would not expect an annual limitation on
the utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards to
significantly reduce our net deferred tax asset, although the
timing of our cash flows may be impacted to the extent any such
annual limitation deferred the utilization of our net operating
loss carryforwards to future tax years.
54
We are
included in HLTHs consolidated group for federal income
tax purposes and, as a result, may be liable for any shortfall
in HLTHs federal income tax payments
We will be included in the HLTH consolidated group for federal
income tax purposes as long as HLTH continues to own 80% of the
total value of our capital stock. By virtue of its controlling
ownership and our Tax Sharing Agreement with HLTH, HLTH
effectively controls all our tax decisions. Moreover,
notwithstanding the Tax Sharing Agreement, federal tax law
provides that each member of a consolidated group is jointly and
severally liable for the groups entire federal income tax
obligation. Thus, to the extent HLTH or other members of the
group fail to make any federal income tax payments required of
them by law, we would be liable for the shortfall. Similar
principles generally apply for income tax purposes in some
state, local and foreign jurisdictions.
Other
Risks Applicable to Our Company and to Ownership of Our
Securities
Negative
conditions in the market for certain auction rate securities may
result in WebMD incurring a loss on such investments
As of September 30, 2008, WebMD had a total of
approximately $165.5 million (face value) of investments in
certain auction rate securities (ARS). Those ARS had a book
value of $132.8 million, net of an impairment charge taken
during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The types of ARS
investments that WebMD owns are backed by student loans, 97% of
which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. WebMD does not own any other type of ARS investments.
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held
auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being
able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In
the event WebMD needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments,
it may not be able to do so until a future auction on these
types of investments is successful or until a buyer is found
outside the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling
to purchase the investments at their carrying amount, WebMD
would incur a loss on any such sales.
Acquisitions,
business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to
complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for
our business and our security holders
WebMD has been built, in part, through acquisitions. We intend
to continue to seek to acquire or to engage in business
combinations with companies engaged in complementary businesses.
In addition, we may enter into joint ventures, strategic
alliances or similar arrangements with third parties. These
transactions may result in changes in the nature and scope of
our operations and changes in our financial condition. Our
success in completing these types of transactions will depend
on, among other things, our ability to locate suitable
candidates and negotiate mutually acceptable terms with them,
and to obtain adequate financing. Significant competition for
these opportunities exists, which may increase the cost of and
decrease the opportunities for these types of transactions.
Financing for these transactions may come from several sources,
including:
|
|
|
| |
|
cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities;
|
| |
| |
|
proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and
|
| |
| |
|
proceeds from the issuance of additional Class A Common
Stock, of preferred stock, of convertible debt or of other
securities.
|
The issuance of additional equity or debt securities could:
|
|
|
| |
|
cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of our
stockholders at the time of the issuance;
|
| |
| |
|
cause substantial dilution of our earnings per share;
|
| |
| |
|
subject us to the risks associated with increased leverage,
including a reduction in our ability to obtain financing or an
increase in the cost of any financing we obtain;
|
55
|
|
|
| |
|
subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our
flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
|
| |
| |
|
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our outstanding
securities.
|
We do not intend to seek security holder approval for any such
acquisition or security issuance unless required by applicable
law, regulation or the terms of then existing securities.
Our
business will suffer if we fail to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in
particular transactions
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire,
businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other
assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses
and assets into our operations, on a cost-effective basis, can
be critical to our future performance. The amount and timing of
the expected benefits of any acquisition, including potential
synergies between our company and the acquired business, are
subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
|
|
|
| |
|
our ability to maintain relationships with the customers of the
acquired business;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to retain or replace key personnel;
|
| |
| |
|
potential conflicts in sponsor or advertising relationships;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to coordinate organizations that are geographically
diverse and may have different business cultures; and
|
| |
| |
|
compliance with regulatory requirements.
|
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be
successfully integrated with our operations in a timely or
cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully
integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated
operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Although our management attempts to evaluate the risks inherent
in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates
appropriately, we cannot assure you that we will properly
ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets
will perform as we expect or enhance the value of our company as
a whole. In addition, acquired companies or businesses may have
larger than expected liabilities that are not covered by the
indemnification, if any, that we are able to obtain from the
sellers.
We may
not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our
business or to exploit opportunities
We may need to raise additional funds to support expansion,
develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to
competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or
technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.
If required, we may raise such additional funds through public
or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or
that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
56
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity, while at the
same time maximizing the yield we receive from our investment
portfolio.
Changes in prevailing interest rates will cause the fair value
of certain of our investments to fluctuate, such as our
investments in auction rate securities that generally bear
interest at rates indexed to LIBOR. As of September 30,
2008, the fair market value of our auction rate securities was
$132.8 million. However, the fair values of our cash and
money market investments, which approximate $199.8 million
at September 30, 2008, are not subject to changes in
interest rates.
WebMD has entered into a non-recourse credit facility
(Credit Facility) with Citigroup that is secured by
its ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest
payable on the ARS holdings), that will allow WebMD to borrow up
to 75% of the face amount of the ARS holdings pledged as
collateral under the Credit Facility. The interest rate
applicable to such borrowings will be one-month LIBOR plus
250 basis points. No borrowings have been made under the
Credit Facility to date.
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b),
WebMD management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of WebMDs disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e),
as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that WebMDs disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of September 30, 2008.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(d),
WebMD management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in
WebMDs internal control over financial reporting occurred
during the third quarter of 2008 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, WebMDs
internal control over financial reporting.
57
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
13,997 shares were withheld from WebMD Restricted Stock
that vested on September 10, 2008 and on September 26,
2008, in order to satisfy withholding tax requirements related
to the vesting of the awards. The value of these shares, which
was $457,928 in the aggregate, was determined based on the
closing fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on
the date of vesting, which was: $27.82 per share on
September 10, 2008 and $32.75 per share on
September 26, 2008. These were the only repurchases of
equity securities made by us during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. We do not have a repurchase program.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index on
page E-1
are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WebMD
Health Corp.
Mark D. Funston
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 10, 2008
59
EXHIBIT INDEX
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 12,
2008, by and among WebMD Health Corp., Charlottes
Corporation and Marketing Technology Solutions Inc.
|
|
|
2
|
.2*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20,
2008, between HLTH Corporation and the Registrant (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 1, filed
on February 25, 2008, to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on February 21, 2008)
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 6, 2008, to Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20, 2008, between
HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on May 7, 2008)
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of September 12, 2008, to
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20,
2008, between HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on September 15, 2008)
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Termination Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2008,
between HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on October 20, 2008)
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed by the Registrant on September 29, 2005 (the
Form 8-A))
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on December 17, 2007)
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain of the exhibits and schedules to this agreement have
been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K.
The Registrant will furnish copies of any of the exhibits and
schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
E-1